首页> 外文学位 >In the name of honor: Qian Qianyi (1582-1664) and the politics of loyalty in late imperial China.
【24h】

In the name of honor: Qian Qianyi (1582-1664) and the politics of loyalty in late imperial China.

机译:以荣誉的名义:钱谦益(1582-1664)与帝国末期的忠诚政治。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation explores Chinese discourse on loyalty during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries as it was produced in the contexts of Confucian revival, foreign conquest, and Manchu-Chinese dynamics. The aim of my thesis is a contextualization of the complex of ideas surrounding loyalty as exemplified in the fall of the prominent literatus Qian Qianyi (1582--1664), who cooperated with the Manchus during the Ming-Qing dynastic transition. This discourse on loyalty, I argue, evolved from historical and literary tropes into an ethical standard manifested in storytelling, history writing, and censorship. Subject to contention, these ideas were first employed by Chinese literati as an expression of their indigenous cultural identity and subsequently utilized by Manchu rulers in imperially commissioned historiography as an argument against collaboration with new conquerors. This study allows me to shed new light on the convergence of preexisting Chinese cultural values with the rationale of Qing imperial ideology. Loyalism, originally an anti-Manchu sentiment, ironically had been turned into a tool for the political consolidation of the Qing rulers' control over the literati.;The introduction looks into issues that surrounded the nuances of loyalty in late imperial China and it also analyzes the reception of Qian Qianyi in modern scholarship since the early twentieth century. Chapters One and Two examine Qian Qianyi's life during the Ming in terms of his achievements in scholarship, his political activism, and his involvement with courtesan culture. Chapters Three and Four situate Qian's life within the early Qing sphere of Ming loyalism and its impact on some aspects of the system of values, history writing, and religion. Chapter Five analyzes the available political options and historical contingencies during the early period of Qing takeover. Chapter Six describes early Qing remembrances of the late Ming, especially the changing attitudes toward Qian Qianyi's reputation in different sources. Chapter Seven explores how ideas about loyalism circulated in between collective memory and historical records, and how they were taken over by the Qing rulers in the new historiographical category of Erchen zhuan (Biographies of twice-serving ministers) to condemn their Chinese collaborators at the beginning of the Qing.
机译:本文探讨了十七,十八世纪中国关于忠诚的论述,这种论述是在儒家复兴,外国征服和满汉动态的背景下产生的。本文的目的是围绕围绕忠诚的各种思想进行情境化,例如著名的文人钱谦益(1582--1664)的倒台就是例证,钱谦益在明清时期与满族合作。我认为,这种关于忠诚的论述已从历史和文学上的对等演变为讲故事,历史写作和审查制度中体现的一种道德标准。受到争议的是,这些思想首先被中国文人用来表达其本土文化身份,随后被满族统治者在帝国主义委托的史学中用于反对与新征服者合作的论点。这项研究使我对清朝帝国意识形态的理论基础与先前存在的中国文化价值观的融合有了新的认识。忠诚主义原本是一种反满族的情绪,但具有讽刺意味的是,它已变成政治上巩固清朝统治者对文人的控制的工具。导言探讨了围绕帝国末代忠诚的细微差别的问题,并对其进行了分析。自20世纪初以来,钱谦一在现代学术界的接受程度很高。第一章和第二章从钱谦益的学术成就,政治积极性以及对妓女文化的参与等方面考察了钱谦益在明代的生活。第三章和第四章将钱氏的生活置于明清忠诚主义的清朝初期,并对其价值体系,历史写作和宗教的某些方面产生影响。第五章分析了清朝接管初期可用的政治选择和历史偶然性。第六章描述了明末清初的记忆,尤其是对钱谦益在不同方面的声誉态度的变化。第七章探讨了关于忠诚主义的思想如何在集体记忆和历史记录之间传播,以及在新的史学类别的“二臣传”中清朝统治者如何接管这些思想,以一开始就谴责中国的合作者清。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lin, Hsueh-Yi.;

  • 作者单位

    Princeton University.;

  • 授予单位 Princeton University.;
  • 学科 History Asia Australia and Oceania.;Political Science General.;Philosophy.;Ethics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 393 p.
  • 总页数 393
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:45:48

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号