首页> 外文学位 >The right to life with dignity: Economic and social rights respect in the world.
【24h】

The right to life with dignity: Economic and social rights respect in the world.

机译:享有生命的尊严:世界范围内对经济和社会权利的尊重。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The international human rights system formally recognizes two principal categories of rights: civil and political (CP) rights and economic, social, and cultural (ESC) rights. While these are in theory equal and indivisible, CP rights have been heavily prioritized in reality. This project seeks to address this imbalance, focusing on ESC rights realization.;Conceiving of ESC rights as a path between CP rights and development helps anchor the concept and offers a constructive perspective on how these rights can contribute to the alleviation of human suffering. Building upon this theoretical foundation (described more fully in Chapter II), the greater part of this project focuses on ESC rights to better understand what they are, where they are upheld, and why they are protected or violated. Thus the driving questions motivating this project are: what are ESC rights, where are they being referenced and utilized successfully, and why?;The first question of ESC rights content is a background question, which lays the foundation for the subsequent and more central questions regarding their successful provision. Chapter III presents the relevant theoretical and practical components of ESC rights, and builds on previous studies to present a framework for their measurement. The resulting ESC rights index purports to capture this concept in a single indicator, which then is incorporated into the subsequent statistical investigation.;This quantitative analysis addresses the second question, which asks where ESC rights are being used effectively. Following an extended description of methodology and data issues in Chapter IV, Chapter V immediately employs the newly developed ESC rights construct in response to this second question. The measure is applied at the country level to gain a better understanding of where around the world ESC rights are most -- and least -- realized. This analysis is comparative both within ESC rights (between various categories of countries) and between ESC and CP rights. Results show that countries have consistently improved their ESC rights record in recent decades. In contrast, CP rights scores have remained relatively constant. Additionally, countries' ESC rights scores are converging, while the relative distance between CP rights scores has changed very little over the same time period.;The third and final question further extends this examination, to consider the underlying conditions associated with the respect and provision of ESC rights. Chapter VI helps shed light on whether variables included in earlier CP rights studies have similar impacts on ESC rights, or whether a different collection of variables better explains ESC rights outcomes. It appears that a broader spectrum of issues is involved in at least ESC rights promotion. Results of analyses by income level suggest that, in general, political factors are more influential for CP rights, and economic factors for ESC rights. Moreover, results vary more by countries' economic development level in the ESC rights analyses. Consequently, policy recommendations may differ not only between CP and ESC rights, but also within these categories.;While previous investigations have provided valuable insights into human rights provision, the exclusive focus on CP rights has resulted in an incomplete analysis. This research project fills this gap by considering the interaction of political, economic, and social conditions on ESC rights violation. Gaining this type of new and constructive information has important implications for academic research, policy formulation, and project work happening at the field level. Chapter VII concludes by highlighting these areas of impact, and identifying the relevant individuals and institutions implicated in the pursuit of continued and future ESC rights realization.
机译:国际人权制度正式承认两大类权利:公民和政治(CP)权利以及经济,社会和文化(ESC)权利。尽管这些在理论上是平等且不可分割的,但实际上,CP权利已被高度优先考虑。该项目旨在解决这一不平衡问题,着重于实现ESC权利。将ESC权利作为CP权利与发展之间的途径的概念有助于锚定这一概念,并提供关于这些权利如何有助于减轻人类痛苦的建设性观点。基于这一理论基础(在第二章中有更全面的介绍),该项目的大部分重点放在ESC权利上,以更好地了解它们的含义,所维护的权利以及为什么要保护或侵犯它们。因此,激励该项目的驱动问题是:什么是ESC权利,在哪里成功地引用和利用了它们?为什么?; ESC权利内容的第一个问题是背景问题,为随后的更多核心问题奠定了基础关于他们的成功提供。第三章介绍了ESC权利的相关理论和实践组成部分,并在以前的研究的基础上提出了衡量其权利的框架。由此产生的ESC权利指数旨在将这一概念包含在一个指标中,然后将其整合到随后的统计调查中。该定量分析解决了第二个问题,即在何处有效使用ESC权利。在第四章中对方法论和数据问题进行了详细描述之后,第五章立即采用了新开发的ESC权利结构来回应第二个问题。该措施适用于国家/地区级别,以更好地了解全世界ESC权利最多(或最少)实现的地方。这种分析是在ESC权利(在不同类别的国家之间)以及ESC和CP权利之间的比较。结果表明,最近几十年来,各国一直在改善其ESC权利记录。相反,CP权利得分保持相对恒定。此外,各国的ESC权利分数正在趋同,而CP权利分数之间的相对距离在同一时间段内变化很小。;第三个也是最后一个问题进一步扩展了这一审查,以考虑与尊重和提供相关的基本条件ESC权利。第六章有助于阐明早期CP权利研究中包含的变量是否对ESC权利具有相似的影响,或者不同的变量集合是否更好地解释了ESC权利的结果。看来,至少在ESC权利推广中涉及到更广泛的问题。按收入水平分析的结果表明,总体而言,政治因素对CP权利的影响更大,而经济因素对ESC权利的影响更大。此外,在ESC权利分析中,结果因国家的经济发展水平而异。因此,政策建议可能不仅在CP和ESC权利之间有所不同,而且在这些类别中也可能有所不同。;尽管先前的调查提供了有关人权规定的宝贵见解,但对CP权利的专门关注导致了不完整的分析。该研究项目通过考虑政治,经济和社会条件与ESC权利侵犯之间的相互作用来填补这一空白。获得此类新的建设性信息对在现场进行的学术研究,政策制定和项目工作具有重要意义。第七章总结了这些影响领域,并确定了与追求持续和未来的ESC权利有关的个人和机构。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kolp, Felicity Ann.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Berkeley.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Berkeley.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Relations.;Political Science General.;Sociology Public and Social Welfare.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 351 p.
  • 总页数 351
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号