首页> 外文学位 >Conflict of Interest: An analysis of the efficacy of Financial Disclosure Policies in Orthopedic Surgery and Professional Schools.
【24h】

Conflict of Interest: An analysis of the efficacy of Financial Disclosure Policies in Orthopedic Surgery and Professional Schools.

机译:利益冲突:在整形外科和专业学校中财务披露政策的效力分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Study Designs. Questionnaire, Retrospective review of disclosure listings Objectives: Quantify the variability in the self-reported disclosures of individual authors presenting at multiple conferences from the same academic year and evaluate how well orthopedic surgeons, were able to interpret and understand disclosure policy statements. Additionally, we will quantify and characterize disclosure policies of professional schools.;Summary of Background Data. In recent years, greater attention has been directed toward determining how financial conflicts of interest may affect the integrity of research methods, data analysis, reporting of results, and even medical education. To address this issue, various financial disclosure policies have been adopted in an attempt to increase the transparency of clinicians. However, there is still a great deal of confusion regarding when and what type of industry relationships need to be disclosed, and at this time there is a paucity of data addressing the consistency of such reporting.;Methods. We compared the disclosure information of authors who presented at three orthopedic society meetings during the same calendar year and quantified discrepancies. We subsequently performed a questionnaire survey; subjects were asked to read each statement in its entirety and identify the statement as either project-specific disclosure or global disclosure. Finally, we reviewed disclosure policies for all 131 accredited medical schools and all 200 accredited law schools were evaluated during August/September 2009.;Results. The results of this review demonstrate that a significant percentage of individuals attending these meetings were found to have inconsistencies in the disclosure information that they had submitted to the different meetings. Forty four percent of those who completed the disclosure survey had three or more incorrect responses. Only 4% of medical had formal guidelines requiring lecturers to disclose these associations to students prior to an educational activity and only 5% had explicit policies directing them to disclose industry affiliations to students before research endeavors.;Conclusions. Orthopedic societies and professional schools have taken an important first step by adopting disclosure policies to manage potential conflict of interests. However, the data presented seriously questions the efficacy of the policies that have been implemented. For these policies to serve their intended purposes a universal policy should be adopted to create full transparency.
机译:研究设计。问卷调查,对披露清单的回顾性审查目的:量化同一学年在多个会议上出席的个人作者的自我报告披露的差异,并评估整形外科医生能够很好地理解和理解披露政策声明。此外,我们将量化和描述专业学校的公开政策。;背景数据摘要。近年来,人们越来越关注确定财务利益冲突可能如何影响研究方法,数据分析,结果报告甚至医学教育的完整性。为了解决该问题,已经采取了各种财务公开政策以试图增加临床医生的透明度。但是,关于何时以及什么类型的行业关系需要披露仍然存在很多困惑,并且目前缺乏解决此类报告一致性的数据。我们比较了在同一历年中在三个骨科学会会议上发表的作者的披露信息和量化的差异。随后,我们进行了问卷调查;要求受试者阅读每个陈述的全部内容,并将该陈述标识为项目特定披露或全球披露。最后,我们在2009年8月/ 9月审查了所有131所认可的医学院的公开政策,并对所有200所认可的法学院进行了评估。审查结果表明,参加这些会议的个人中有很大比例的人在提交给不同会议的披露信息中存在不一致之处。完成披露调查的受访者中有44%的回答有三个或更多。只有4%的医学有正式的指导方针,要求讲师在进行教育活动之前向学生披露这些协会,只有5%的医学有明确的政策指导他们在研究工作之前向学生披露行业隶属关系。骨科学会和专业学校已采取重要的第一步,即采用披露政策来管理潜在的利益冲突。但是,所提供的数据严重质疑了已实施政策的效力。为了使这些政策达到预期目的,应采用普遍政策以建立充分的透明度。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jegede, Kolawole Anthony.;

  • 作者单位

    Yale University.;

  • 授予单位 Yale University.;
  • 学科 Ethics.;Health education.;Medical ethics.
  • 学位 M.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 50 p.
  • 总页数 50
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号