首页> 外文学位 >Ethical dimensions in Martin Heidegger's early thinking.
【24h】

Ethical dimensions in Martin Heidegger's early thinking.

机译:马丁·海德格尔早期思想中的道德层面。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Martin Heidegger is often accused of neglecting ethics in Being and Time. The accusation stands only if we consider ethics as a theory or system that prescribes imperatives, norms, or rules of action, on the basis of which moral responsibility, obligation, praise, and blame can be attributed to a subject. Since Heidegger overturns the very "metaphysics of the subject" on which such theory is based, there can be no Heideggerian "ethics" in this sense. Not surprisingly, Heidegger himself insists that his interpretation of daily life has "a purely ontological aim, far from any moralizing criticism." At the same time, pivotal sections of Being and Time are replete with analyses of concepts (e.g., authenticity, guilt, responsibility, resoluteness, freedom) that are ethical in another sense. The dissertation argues that these concepts have distinctive ethical content, despite Heidegger's insistence that they are merely formal and provide only the condition for the possibility of ethics. With a view to unpacking this distinctive ethical content, the dissertation analyzes Heidegger's accounts of subjectivity and intersubjectivity and demonstrates how these accounts significantly alter traditional conceptions of responsibility and recognition. It concludes by suggesting how a Heideggerian approach to ethics instructively converges with the approaches of Aristotle, Bernard Williams, and a moderate form of moral particularism, all of which reject transcendent foundations of ethics and a solely rational grounding of morality, while emphasizing the importance of the individual. Heidegger's writing thus invites us to reconsider the scope and nature of ethics in light of his project of fundamental ontology. The interpretation advanced is not only important for how we understand Heidegger's philosophy itself, but it also provides a unique, ontological point of entry into current debates in ethics and metaethics by offering a phenomenologico-ethical description of our lived experience.
机译:马丁·海德格尔(Martin Heidegger)经常被指责在“存在与时间”中忽视道德。只有当我们将伦理学视为规定必要性,规范或行动规则的理论或体系时,该指控才成立,在此基础上,道德责任,义务,赞美和指责可归于主体。由于海德格尔推翻了这种理论所基于的“主体的形而上学”,因此从这个意义上讲,没有海德格尔的“伦理学”。毫不奇怪,海德格尔本人坚持认为,他对日常生活的解释具有“纯粹的本体论目的,而不是任何道德批评。”同时,存在与时间的关键部分充斥着对从另一种意义上讲道德的概念的分析(例如真实性,内感,责任感,坚决性,自由性)。论文认为,尽管海德格尔坚持认为这些概念只是形式上的,并且仅为伦理学的可能性提供条件,但这些概念仍具有独特的伦理学内容。为了揭示这种独特的道德内容,本文分析了海德格尔关于主观性和主体间性的论述,并论证了这些论述如何显着改变传统的责任和认可概念。最后,本文提出了海德格尔的伦理学方法如何与亚里士多德,伯纳德·威廉姆斯以及适度的道德特殊主义方法融为一体的建议,所有这些方法都拒绝了伦理学的超越性基础和道德的纯粹理性基础,同时强调了伦理学的重要性。个人。因此,海德格尔的著作邀请我们根据他的基本本体论项目重新考虑伦理学的范围和性质。先进的解释不仅对我们了解海德格尔哲学本身很重要,而且通过提供对我们所经历的现象学-伦理学的描述,也为进入当前有关伦理学和超伦理学的辩论提供了独特的本体论切入点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Freeman, Lauren.;

  • 作者单位

    Boston University.;

  • 授予单位 Boston University.;
  • 学科 Ethics.;Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 232 p.
  • 总页数 232
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:37:24

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号