首页> 外文学位 >Effectiveness and efficiency of a customized versus conventional orthodontic bracket system.
【24h】

Effectiveness and efficiency of a customized versus conventional orthodontic bracket system.

机译:定制和常规正畸托槽系统的有效性和效率。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The goal of this investigation was to compare the clinical effectiveness and efficiency of a customized versus a conventional orthodontic bracket system. Pre-treatment and post-treatment diagnostic records of 11 patients treated with conventional brackets and 35 patients treated with OrmcoRTM 's Insignia(TM) appliance were analyzed. Initial PAR and age at start of treatment were used to ensure comparable groups. Data regarding total treatment time, number of scheduled appointments, emergency appointments, de-bonded brackets, repositioned brackets and/or detailing bends, final PAR, and ABO score was collected and compared. Insignia(TM) proved to be an effective tooth-moving appliance based on final PAR score. Further, cases treated with Insignia(TM) had superior ABO scores compared to the similarly treated cases with conventional brackets. Insignia(TM) was also more efficient in regards to total treatment time and number of scheduled appointments.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较定制与常规正畸托槽系统的临床有效性和效率。分析了11例使用传统支架治疗的患者和35例使用OrmcoRTM的Insignia™矫治器治疗的患者的治疗前和治疗后诊断记录。治疗开始时的初始PAR和年龄用于确保可比较的人群。收集并比较有关总治疗时间,预定约会次数,紧急约会,无骨托槽,重新定位的托槽和/或弯角,最终PAR和ABO得分的数据。根据最终的PAR得分,Insignia™被证明是一种有效的牙齿移动工具。此外,与使用传统托槽进行类似治疗的病例相比,使用Insignia™治疗的病例具有更高的ABO评分。在总治疗时间和预定约会次数方面,Insignia(TM)也更有效。

著录项

  • 作者

    Weber, Dennis J., II.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;

  • 授予单位 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Dentistry.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 51 p.
  • 总页数 51
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号