首页> 外文学位 >Fact, fiction, and fabrication: History, narrative, and the postmodern real from Woolf to Rushdie (Virginia Woolf, Salman Rushdie, Art Spiegelman, Milan Kundera, Czechoslovakia, Graham Swift).
【24h】

Fact, fiction, and fabrication: History, narrative, and the postmodern real from Woolf to Rushdie (Virginia Woolf, Salman Rushdie, Art Spiegelman, Milan Kundera, Czechoslovakia, Graham Swift).

机译:事实,虚构和虚构:从伍尔夫到拉什迪的历史,叙事和后现代现实(弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫,萨尔曼·拉什迪,斯皮格曼,米兰·昆德拉,捷克斯洛伐克,格雷厄姆·斯威夫特)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

While most accounts of Western attitudes towards history in the nineteenth century suggest that Victorians had a faith in its origin, teleology and meaning, twentieth-century assessments of history more often suggest the opposite. Both poststructural theory and postmodern historiography in the wake of Hayden White's Metahistory present a relativist view of the possibility of either objectivity or material referentiality in historical discourse, particularly through the medium of narrative. From this perspective, historical narrative is defined as a discursive creation that obscures the material relations of its production and as an instrument of ideology and oppression.; “Fact, Fiction, and Fabrication” investigates what political and ethical repercussions this attitude towards and theorization of history has and how much contemporary fiction typically labeled “postmodern” both initially reflects and ultimately denies this model. This study argues that the assessment of contemporary postmodern fiction as reflecting poststructural models of endless textuality denies an important element of the novels studied: their commitment to the possibility of accessing material reality and the importance of such access both for the construction of an ethics and for political agency.{09}By looking closely at contemporary novels that explicitly theorize history and historiography, it becomes clear that they instead insist on a sense of the “real” at least in part because of these political concerns. These novels, which I label “postmodernist historical fiction,” insist that although an inviolable origin, teleology, and even consistent referentiality cannot be obtained in historical reference, there can be a provisional referentiality and access to the real without a return to the classical history of foundationalism, immanence and teleology that contributes to hegemony. These texts are also tied together by their deployment of nonnarrative methods that counter the deformation of the real that takes place within narrative discourse according to White, among others. The primary texts considered are Art Spiegelman's Maus, Milan Kundera's The Book of Laughter and Forgetting, Virginia Woolf's Between the Acts , Graham Swift's Waterland, and Salman Rushdie's Midnight's Children.
机译:尽管在19世纪大多数西方人对历史的态度都表明维多利亚时代人对它的起源,目的论和意义有信心,但是20世纪对历史的评估却常常相反。海登·怀特(Hayden White)的《元历史》(Metahistory)之后的后结构理论和后现代史学都提出了相对论的观点,即历史话语中客观性或物质指称性的可能性,尤其是通过叙事媒介。从这个角度来看,历史叙事被定义为一种话语创造,它掩盖了其生产的物质关系,并被视为意识形态和压迫的工具。 “事实,虚构和虚构”调查了这种态度和对历史的理论化所产生的政治和伦理影响,以及通常被贴上“后现代”标记的当代小说在最初反映并最终否定了这种模式。这项研究认为,对当代后现代小说的评估反映出无休止的文本性的后结构模型,否认了所研究小说的重要元素:他们对获取物质现实的可能性的承诺,以及这种获取对于建立道德和道德观念的重要性。 {09}通过仔细观察明确地将历史和史学理论化的当代小说,很明显,他们至少在某种程度上由于这些政治问题而坚持“真实”的感觉。我将这些小说称为“后现代主义历史小说”,他们坚持认为,尽管在历史参考文献中无法获得不可侵犯的渊源,目的论甚至连贯的指称性,但在不回归古典历史的情况下,可能会有临时的指称性和对真实的获取。基础主义,内在性和目的论的观点,它们助长了霸权。这些文本还通过部署非叙事方法而相互联系,这些方法可以抵消怀特等在叙事性话语中发生的真实变形。所考虑的主要文字是阿皮·斯皮格曼的 Maus ,米兰·昆德拉的《笑与遗忘之书》 ,弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫的在《使徒行传》 ,Graham Swift的。 Waterland 和Salman Rushdie的 Midnight's Children

著录项

  • 作者

    Berlatsky, Eric Lawrence.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Maryland College Park.;

  • 授予单位 University of Maryland College Park.;
  • 学科 Literature English.; Literature Modern.; Literature Comparative.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 487 p.
  • 总页数 487
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 世界文学;文学理论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:44:43

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号