首页> 外文学位 >Universal health insurance: What is the moral price tag?
【24h】

Universal health insurance: What is the moral price tag?

机译:全民健康保险:道德价格标签是多少?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The concept of universal healthcare is perceived as a panacea by many. Most of the industrialized world has recognized universal healthcare as desirable. Universal health insurance seems to be appealing as a remedy to an ailing system. Skyrocketing medical costs and serious inequities in the distribution of services have become glaringly apparent in the United States; Failure to find a resolution to the economic implications may threaten the fiscal well being of the nation. The high number of uninsured contributes to escalating healthcare costs because those that are uninsured do not seek primary care and utilize more expensive routes of care such as the emergency room when they become ill. The Medicaid and Medicare systems are on the verge of bankruptcy. A single payer system may not be the ideal way of improving the current healthcare dilemmas of the United States. From a moral perspective, a single payer system of healthcare will not assure entitlement of basic rights nor provide for greater justice or beneficence to any greater extent than the current capitalistic system. The majority of Americans are not likely to willingly trade the relatively good health benefits that they enjoy currently for the bureaucracy, restrictions, and potentially hazardous attributes of government run healthcare. We certainly do not need to trade what we currently have for a system that might cost more than a trillion dollars while at the same time providing more limitations on treatment options. The problem can be solved by using the funds that are already allocated but in a more efficient manner. There needs to be shared responsibility for healthcare costs between government, employers, and consumers. The current tax framework needs to be reconfigured. Medicaid and Medicare demonstrate further evidence that government regulation in healthcare should be reduced, not expanded. Reforming Medicare however, is an obstacle that it is politically unpopular. American values of freedom, autonomy, and liberty must remain intact as healthcare reform evolves.
机译:普遍医疗保健的概念被许多人视为灵丹妙药。大多数工业化国家已将全民医疗保健视为理想之选。全民健康保险似乎是对生病系统的一种补救措施。在美国,飙升的医疗费用和严重的服务分配不均现象已变得显而易见。无法找到解决经济影响的方法,可能威胁到国家的财政状况。大量未投保的人会导致医疗费用不断上涨,因为那些未投保的人不会求助于初级保健,而是在病时使用更昂贵的护理途径,例如急诊室。医疗补助和医疗保险制度濒临破产。单一付款人系统可能不是改善美国当前医疗困境的理想方法。从道德的角度来看,单一的医疗保健付款人制度将无法确保基本权利的享有,也不会提供比当前资本主义制度更大的正义或更大的福利。大多数美国人不太可能愿意为了政府官僚机构的官僚主义,限制和潜在的危险特性而享受他们目前享有的相对较好的健康益处。我们当然不需要用我们现有的东西来换购一个可能花费超过一万亿美元的系统,同时又对治疗选择提供了更多的限制。该问题可以通过使用已经分配但更有效的方式解决。政府,雇主和消费者之间需要共同承担医疗费用。当前的税收框架需要重新配置。 Medicaid和Medicare证明了进一步的证据,表明应该减少而不是扩大政府对医疗的监管。但是,改革医疗保险是一个障碍,因为它在政治上不受欢迎。随着医疗改革的发展,美国的自由,自治和自由价值观必须保持不变。

著录项

  • 作者

    Beckford, Michelle.;

  • 作者单位

    Drew University.;

  • 授予单位 Drew University.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Medical Ethics.;Health Sciences Health Care Management.
  • 学位 D.M.H.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 148 p.
  • 总页数 148
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号