首页> 外文学位 >Safety Evaluation of Roadway Lighting Illuminance Levels and its Relationship with Nighttime Crash Injury Severity for West Central Florida Region.
【24h】

Safety Evaluation of Roadway Lighting Illuminance Levels and its Relationship with Nighttime Crash Injury Severity for West Central Florida Region.

机译:佛罗里达州中西部地区道路照明照度水平的安全性评估及其与夜间碰撞伤害严重程度的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The main role of roadway lighting is to produce quick, accurate and comfortable visibility during nighttime conditions. It is commonly known that good lighting levels enable motorists, pedestrians and bicyclists to obtain necessary visual information in an effective and efficient manner. Many previous studies also proved that roadway lighting minimizes the likelihood of crashes by providing better visibility for roadway users.;Appropriate and adequate roadway lighting illuminance levels for each roadway classification and pedestrian areas are essential to provide safe and comfortable usage. These levels are usually provided by national, or local standards and guidelines. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Plan Preparation Manual recommends a roadway lighting illuminance level average standard of 1.0 horizontal foot candle (fc) for all the roadway segments used in this research. The FDOT Plan Preparation Manual also states that this value should be considered standard, but should be increased if necessary to maintain an acceptable uniformity illuminance ratio.;This study aimed to find the relationship between nighttime crash injury severity and roadway lighting illuminance. To accomplish this, the research team analyzed crash data and roadway lighting illuminance measured in roadway segments within the West Central Florida Region. An Ordered Probit Model was developed to understand the relationship between roadway lighting illuminance levels and crash injury severity. Additionally, a Negative Binomial Model was used to determine which roadway lighting illuminance levels can be more beneficial in reducing the counts of crashes resulting in injuries.;A comprehensive literature review was conducted using longitudinal studies with and without roadway lighting. Results showed that on the same roadways there was a significant decrease in the number of nighttime crashes with the presence of roadway lighting. In this research, roadway lighting illuminance was measured every 40 feet using an Advanced Lighting Measurement System (ALMS) on a total of 245 centerline miles of roadway segments within the West Central Florida Region. The data were mapped and then analyzed using the existing mile post.;During the process of crash data analysis, it was observed that rear-end collisions were the most common first harmful event observed in all crashes, regardless of the lighting conditions. Meanwhile, the average injury severity for all crashes, was found to be possible injury regardless of the lighting conditions (day, dark, dusk, and dawn).;Finally, this research presented an Ordered Probit Model, developed to understand the existing relationship between roadway lighting illuminance levels and injury severity within the West Central Florida Region. It was observed that having a roadway lighting average moving illuminance range between 0.4 to 0.6 foot candles (fc) was more likely to have a positive effect in reducing the probability of injury severity during a nighttime crash. A Negative Binomial Model was conducted to determine if the roadway lighting average moving illuminance level, found on the Ordered Probit Model was beneficial in reducing crash injury severity during nighttime, would also be beneficial in reducing the counts of crashes resulting in injuries. It was observed that a roadway lighting average moving illuminance, range between 0.4 to 0.6 fc, was more likely to reduce the count of crashes resulting in injuries during nighttime conditions, thus increasing roadway safety. It was also observed that other factors such as pavement condition, site location (intersection or no intersection), number of lanes, and traffic volume can affect the severity and counts of nighttime crashes.;The results of this study suggest that simply adding more roadway lighting does not make the roadway safer. The fact is that a reduction in the amount of roadway lighting illuminance can produce savings in energy consumption and help the environment by reducing light pollution. Moreover, these results show that designing roadway lighting systems go beyond the initial design process, it also requires continuous maintenance. Furthermore, regulations for new developments and the introduction of additional lighting sources near roadway facilities (that are not created with the intent of being used for roadway users) need to be created.
机译:道路照明的主要作用是在夜间条件下产生快速,准确和舒适的视野。众所周知,良好的照明水平可使驾驶者,行人和骑自行车的人以有效和高效的方式获得必要的视觉信息。先前的许多研究还证明,道路照明通过为道路使用者提供更好的可见性而将发生碰撞的可能性降到最低。对于每种道路类别和行人区域,适当和适当的道路照明照度水平对于提供安全舒适的使用至关重要。这些级别通常由国家或地方标准和指南提供。佛罗里达运输部(FDOT)计划准备手册建议,本研究中使用的所有道路段的道路照明照度水平平均标准为1.0水平英尺烛光(fc)。 FDOT计划准备手册还指出,该值应视为标准值,但在必要时应增加该值,以保持可接受的均匀度照度比。该研究旨在寻找夜间碰撞伤害严重程度与道路照明照度之间的关系。为此,研究团队分析了佛罗里达州中西部地区道路段中测得的碰撞数据和道路照明照度。开发了有序Probit模型来了解巷道照明照度水平与碰撞伤害严重性之间的关系。此外,使用负二项式模型来确定哪种道路照明照度级别在减少导致伤害的碰撞次数方面更有利。通过对有或没有道路照明的纵向研究进行了全面的文献综述。结果表明,在相同的道路上,由于道路照明的存在,夜间撞车的次数大大减少了。在这项研究中,使用先进的照明测量系统(ALMS)在佛罗里达州中西部地区245个中心线英里的道路段上,每40英尺测量一次道路照明照度。数据被映射,然后使用现有的里程标进行分析。在碰撞数据分析过程中,观察到在所有碰撞中,无论照明条件如何,追尾碰撞都是最常见的第一有害事件。同时,发现所有碰撞的平均伤害严重性,无论光照条件如何(白天,黑暗,黄昏和黎明),都可能造成伤害。最后,本研究提出了一种有序概率模型,旨在了解两者之间的现有关系。佛罗里达州中西部地区的道路照明照度水平和伤害严重程度。已观察到,道路照明的平均移动照度范围在0.4到0.6英尺烛光(fc)之间,对于降低夜间车祸中受伤严重性的可能性更有可能发挥积极作用。进行了负二项式模型以确定在有序Probit模型中发现的巷道照明平均移动照度水平是否有助于降低夜间的碰撞伤害严重性,也有助于减少导致伤害的碰撞次数。据观察,巷道照明的平均移动照度在0.4至0.6 fc之间,更可能减少在夜间条件下导致人员受伤的撞车次数,从而提高巷道安全性。还观察到其他因素,如人行道状况,工地位置(相交或无相交处),车道数量和交通量,都可能影响夜间交通事故的严重程度和数量。该研究结果表明,只需增加更多的道路照明不能使道路更安全。事实是,减少巷道照明照度可以节省能源并通过减少光污染来帮助保护环境。而且,这些结果表明,道路照明系统的设计超出了最初的设计过程,还需要持续的维护。此外,需要制定新的开发法规以及在道路设施附近引入额外的光源(并非为道路使用者使用而创建)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gonzalez-Velez, Enrique.;

  • 作者单位

    University of South Florida.;

  • 授予单位 University of South Florida.;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 144 p.
  • 总页数 144
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号