首页> 外文学位 >Research on the effects of a history-based curriculum on the students' understanding of the concepts of electric field and lines of force.
【24h】

Research on the effects of a history-based curriculum on the students' understanding of the concepts of electric field and lines of force.

机译:研究基于历史的课程对学生理解电场和力线概念的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The difficulties in learning the concepts of electric field and lines of force that have been signaled by the research in science education constitute the starting point of this research. Among the learning difficulties that students have, the assignment of the wrong ontological status to the to be learned concepts has proven to be a main one. Given that many students fail to achieve the scientific understanding of these concepts after a traditional instruction, this research was set out to design research-based instructional material and test its influence on the ontology assigned by the students to these concepts. The instructional material was designed using examples taken from the history of physics so that an ontological analysis of the early scientists' ideas was used to help students understand the ontology of the early conceptions compared to the ontology of the modern scientific ones. The instructional material was tested with a group physics major students at an Argentinean university.; The predicates used by the students to describe an entity were taken as evidence of their ontological commitments with respect to field and lines of force. Differences in the proportion of correct predicates versus wrong ones were measured between two groups (experimental and control). These differences were detected using a quantitative measure taken from written data and were confirmed through oral interviews with some students. Although the wrong characterization of the learned entities was not absolutely eradicated from the students, a better characterization of them was present within the experimental ones.; It was also found that the ontological understanding of a concept is not related to the success in solving traditional end-of-chapter problems. This result confirms that there is a part of the physics discipline that we are leaving aside when testing is limited to the ability to solve this type of problems.
机译:科学教育的研究表明,在学习电场和力线概念方面的困难构成了本研究的起点。在学生所面临的学习困难中,将错误的本体论状态分配给要学习的概念已被证明是主要问题。鉴于许多学生在传统教学后无法对这些概念有科学的了解,因此本研究旨在设计基于研究的教学材料,并测试其对学生分配给这些概念的本体的影响。使用从物理学史中获取的实例来设计教学材料,以便对早期科学家的思想进行本体论分析,以帮助学生与现代科学概念的本体论相比,了解早期概念的本体论。该教学材料是由一所阿根廷大学的一组物理专业学生进行测试的;学生用来描述一个实体的谓词被视为他们在力场和力线上的本体论承诺的证据。在两组(实验组和对照组)之间测量了正确谓词与错误谓词的比例差异。这些差异是通过使用书面数据中的定量方法来检测的,并通过与一些学生的口头访谈得到了证实。尽管不能完全从学生身上消除对学习实体的错误描述,但是在实验对象中可以更好地描述它们。还发现,对概念的本体理解与成功解决传统的章末问题无关。该结果证实,当测试仅限于解决此类问题的能力时,我们会抛弃一部分物理学科。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pocovi, Marta Cecilia.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Minnesota.;

  • 授予单位 University of Minnesota.;
  • 学科 Education Sciences.; Education Higher.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 235 p.
  • 总页数 235
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 自然科学教育与普及;高等教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号