首页> 外文学位 >Federal governance regimes for ocean ecosystems in Canada: Accountability within collaborative management regimes.
【24h】

Federal governance regimes for ocean ecosystems in Canada: Accountability within collaborative management regimes.

机译:加拿大海洋生态系统的联邦治理制度:协作管理制度内的问责制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis develops and verifies a methodology to measure the extent to which the principles of a collaborative and ecosystem approach have been reconciled with the principles of sound accountability, including ministerial responsibility. The thesis reviews three decades of institutional interventions in Canada intended to strengthen oceans governance, then distills the underlying assumptions of a new paradigm for collaborative oceans governance at the scale of a large marine ecosystem. The focus is on the accountability implications of Canada's new oceans governance model, including a new governance regime which is based on trust rather than the traditional regime which is based on blame. An Oceans Governance Accountability Framework is presented and indicators of accountability are designed and employed to measure the extent to which credible reporting, an effective holding to account and Integrated Management of Large Ocean Management Areas have occurred.; These indicators of accountability are applied to the relationships between the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans and Parliament, the Minister and other ministers and the Minister and other users of the ocean. The indicators are applied to a Large Ocean Management Area, the Eastern Scotian Shelf.; The two major conclusions are that the indicators of accountability provide a practical approach for assessing collaborative and ecosystem management programs, and that the Government of Canada has not convincingly demonstrated that it has reconciled the principles of a collaborative and ecosystem management approach with the principles of sound accountability. The last chapter distills important lessons learned from the Canadian experience for other jurisdictions, such as the need to define accountability before the promulgation of a major environmental policy.
机译:本论文开发并验证了一种方法,用于测量协作和生态系统方法的原则与健全的问责制(包括部长级职责)原则之间的协调程度。本文回顾了加拿大旨在加强海洋治理的三十年的机构干预,然后从大型海洋生态系统的规模中提炼出一种新的合作海洋治理范式的基本假设。重点是加拿大新海洋治理模式的问责性含义,包括基于信任的新治理制度,而不是基于责备的传统治理制度。提出了海洋治理问责制框架,并设计和采用了问责制指标,以衡量可信报告,对大海洋管理区进行有效保留和综合管理的程度。这些问责指标适用于渔业和海洋部长与议会,部长和其他部长以及部长和其他海洋使用者之间的关系。这些指标适用于大海洋管理区,即东斯科托陆架。两个主要结论是,问责制指标为评估合作和生态系统管理计划提供了一种切实可行的方法,加拿大政府没有令人信服地表明它已将协调和生态系统管理方法的原则与合理的原则进行了协调。问责制。上一章摘录了从加拿大的经验中吸取的其他重要经验教训,例如在颁布重大环境政策之前必须确定问责制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号