首页> 外文学位 >Fields and armor: A comparative analysis of English feudalism and Japanese hokensei.
【24h】

Fields and armor: A comparative analysis of English feudalism and Japanese hokensei.

机译:战场与盔甲:对英国封建制度与日本封建制度的比较分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Fields and Armor is a comparative study of English feudalism from the Norman Conquest until the reign of King Henry II (1154-1189) and Japan’s first military government, the Kamakura Bakufu (1185-1333). This thesis was designed to examine the validity of a European-Japanese comparison. Such comparisons have been attempted in the past. However, many historians on both sides of the equation have levied some serious criticism against these endeavors. In light, of these valid criticisms, this thesis has been a comparison of medieval English government and that of the Kamakura-Samurai, because of a variety of geographic, cultural and social similarities that existed in both regions. These similarities include similar military organizations and parallel developments, which resulted in the formation of two of most centralized military governments in either Western Europe or East Asia, and finally, the presence and real enforcement of two forms of unitary inheritance in both locales.
机译:《战地与装甲》是对从诺曼征服直到亨利二世(1154-1189年)和日本第一个军政府镰仓爆破(1185-1333)统治期间的英国封建制度的比较研究。本文旨在检验欧日比较的有效性。过去已经尝试过这种比较。但是,等式两边的许多历史学家都对这些努力提出了严重的批评。鉴于这些有效的批评,由于两个地区存在着多种地理,文化和社会相似之处,因此本文将中世纪英国政府与镰仓武士政府进行了比较。这些相似之处包括相似的军事组织和平行发展,这导致在西欧或东亚建立了两个最中央集权的军事政府,最后在两个地区都存在并真正执行了两种形式的统一继承。

著录项

  • 作者

    Garrison, Arthur Thomas.;

  • 作者单位

    University of North Texas.;

  • 授予单位 University of North Texas.;
  • 学科 History Asia Australia and Oceania.;History Medieval.;History World History.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 137 p.
  • 总页数 137
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:44:20

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号