首页> 外文学位 >The role of dispute settlement mechanisms in the constitutionalization of Regional Trade Agreements.
【24h】

The role of dispute settlement mechanisms in the constitutionalization of Regional Trade Agreements.

机译:争端解决机制在区域贸易协定宪法化中的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper discusses the role played by Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in the European Union and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and the way in which they potentially contribute to the constitutionalization of such Regional Trade Agreements. The European Court of Justice has played a major role in the constitutionalization of the European Union due to the preliminary reference procedure, as well as the principles of direct effect and supremacy. The lack of availability to NAFTA Dispute Resolution Mechanisms of the principles which are so influential with the European Court of Justice mean that NAFTA's Dispute Resolution Mechanisms are unable to drive constitutionalization in a manner similar to the ECJ. Chapter 11 of NAFTA however has the potential to act as a agent of constitutionalization within the scope of international investment law, but not of NAFTA itself.
机译:本文讨论了争端解决机制在欧盟和北美自由贸易协定(NAFTA)中所扮演的角色,以及它们潜在地促进此类区域贸易协定宪法化的方式。由于初步的参考程序以及直接效力和至高无上的原则,欧洲法院在欧盟的宪法化中发挥了重要作用。 NAFTA争端解决机制缺乏对欧洲法院具有影响力的原则,这意味着NAFTA的争端解决机制无法以类似于ECJ的方式推动宪法化。但是,《北美自由贸易协定》第11章有潜力在国际投资法范围内充当宪法的代理人,而不是《北美自由贸易协定》本身。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jensen, Theresa.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 Law.;Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 LL.M.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 73 p.
  • 总页数 73
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号