首页> 外文学位 >Selection criteria and student access to Algebra I.
【24h】

Selection criteria and student access to Algebra I.

机译:选择标准和学生对代数I的访问。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to determine the standards and measures teachers and counselors use to place students in one-year versus two-year algebra and to identify predictors of high grades. Traditionally, methods for sorting students into algebra courses have been vague and inconsistent, creating school site practices that are counterproductive and inequitable for students who are denied access, either because of perceived ability or curriculum “tracking.” Therefore, two hypotheses were examined for this research: (1) Selection criteria used to determine which students will access Algebra I are subjective and based on perceptions about the student's mathematics ability rather than identified standards or an accurate measure of a student's mathematics ability and (2) Unspecified criteria and informal school site practices rather than state mandates or prior student achievement determine whether or not a student will access one-year or two-year algebra.;This study included two populations from two urban school districts in southern California. The first population was 9th grade students who enrolled in and completed one- and two-year algebra courses and the second population was middle and high school teachers and counselors. Two data sets were also utilized: (1) Quantitative student data, which included: Norm Reference Test scores, 8th and 9th grade mathematics course enrollment, 8th and 9th grade mathematics grades, gender, and ethnicity and (2) Teacher and counselor survey data regarding selection criteria and standards for student placement in algebra.;A series of t-test and Pearson correlations were conducted to determine the statistical differences between the identified measures for students in one-year algebra when compared to students enrolled in two-year algebra. Discriminant Analyses and Multiple Regression analyses were utilized to evaluate which variables identified by both teachers and counselors were actually the best predictors of algebra placement and academic success and whether demographic variables contributed more to placement than academic criteria. The findings for this study include: (1) Students in one-year algebra had statistically significantly higher academic achievement than two-year students, (2) Academic criteria identified by teachers are strong predictors of performance in algebra, and (3) Teacher practices have not been influenced by state mandates.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定教师和辅导员用来将学生分为一年和两年代数的标准和方法,并确定高年级的预测因子。传统上,将学生分类为代数课程的方法是模糊且不一致的,这会导致因感知能力或课程“跟踪”而被拒绝访问的学生适得其反,而且是不公平的。因此,本研究考察了两个假设:(1)用于确定哪些学生将学习代数I的选择标准是主观的,并且基于对学生数学能力的认识,而不是基于确定的标准或对学生数学能力的准确衡量和( 2)未指定的标准和非正式的学校实践而不是州规定的要求或先前的学生成绩决定了学生是否将学习一年或两年的代数;该研究包括来自加利福尼亚南部两个城市学区的两个人口。第一类是九年级学生,他们参加并完成了一年和两年制的代数课程,第二类是初中和高中老师和顾问。还利用了两个数据集:(1)定量的学生数据,包括:规范参考测试成绩,8年级和9年级数学课程入学人数,8年级和9年级数学等级,性别和种族以及(2)老师和辅导员调查数据有关选择标准和学生在代数中的位置的标准。进行了一系列的t检验和Pearson相关性,以确定与在两年代数中注册的学生相比,在一年代数中为学生确定的度量之间的统计差异。判别分析和多元回归分析用于评估由老师和辅导员确定的哪些变量实际上是代数安置和学术成就的最佳预测指标,以及人口统计学变量对安置的影响是否超过学术标准。这项研究的发现包括:(1)在统计学上,一年制代数的学生比两年制学生的学业成绩显着更高;(2)老师确定的学术标准是代数成绩的有力预测指标,(3)老师的实践不受国家命令的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kennedy, Lynne B.;

  • 作者单位

    The Claremont Graduate University.;

  • 授予单位 The Claremont Graduate University.;
  • 学科 Education Mathematics.;Education Curriculum and Instruction.;Education Teacher Training.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 230 p.
  • 总页数 230
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号