首页> 外文学位 >Disadvantaged groups, the use of courts and their impact: A case study of legal mobilization in Argentina.
【24h】

Disadvantaged groups, the use of courts and their impact: A case study of legal mobilization in Argentina.

机译:弱势群体,法院的使用及其影响:阿根廷法律动员的案例研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the context of rising judicialization of politics, Argentina presents a case that is relevant and is worth our attention for the insights it provides to the phenomenon of legal mobilization. This dissertation describes and analyzes how two disadvantaged groups in this country---LGBT and indigenous---used law and courts to achieve their policy ends.;I suggest some answers about what factors make the groups choose the courts, the impact of using the courts, whether social mobilization---support structure---makes any difference on the impact, and what "new" roles are thrust upon courts in the policy making process. Through an interdisciplinary appraisal and the use of empirical analysis, this dissertation fills the gap, adds to the existing literature, and sheds new light on the phenomenon of judicialization of politics.;I began by surveying the literature on legal mobilization and the judicialization of politics and then examined how these two groups built their "social structures for legal mobilization" and mounted their legal campaigns for social change. Although there are some important similarities and differences between these groups, both have used the courts to advance their rights. The impact of the recent efforts of legal mobilization on behalf of LGBT individuals and indigenous peoples on the national Congress and the media turned out to be different. The case studies developed here indicate that when cases are being advanced in court by groups that enjoy considerable social mobilization, what the literature calls the "support structures for legal mobilization," they are likely to achieve the objectives that are sought.;The findings support Charles Epp's "support structure" explanation, suggest a classification of the cases using Marc Galanter's theory about the nature of the parties as one-shotters or repeat players, and provide a fuller understanding of the extent to which courts play a new role in Argentine politics.
机译:在政治司法化程度不断提高的背景下,阿根廷提出了一个相关案件,值得关注,因为它对法律动员现象提供了见解。本文描述并分析了这个国家中的两个弱势群体-LGBT和土著人-如何利用法律和法院来实现其政策目标。法院,无论是社会动员-(支持结构)-对其影响没有任何影响,以及在决策过程中将什么“新”角色强加给法院。通过跨学科的评估和实证分析,本文填补了空白,增加了现有文献,为政治司法化现象提供了新的思路。然后研究了这两个群体如何构建“法律动员的社会结构”并开展了针对社会变革的法律运动。尽管这两个群体之间存在一些重要的异同,但两者都利用法院来推进其权利。事实证明,最近代表LGBT个人和土著人民进行法律动员的努力对国民大会和媒体的影响是不同的。这里开展的案例研究表明,当享有相当大的社会动员的团体在法庭上提起诉讼时,文献称之为“法律动员的支持结构”,他们很可能会实现所寻求的目标。查尔斯·埃普(Charles Epp)的“支持结构”解释,建议使用马克·加兰特(Marc Galanter)的理论来对案件进行分类,以将当事人作为单打或重复参与者的性质,并全面了解法院在阿根廷政治中扮演新角色的程度。

著录项

  • 作者

    Andia, Maria Gracia.;

  • 作者单位

    Northeastern University.;

  • 授予单位 Northeastern University.;
  • 学科 Sociology Theory and Methods.;Law.;Sociology Public and Social Welfare.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 227 p.
  • 总页数 227
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号