首页> 外文学位 >The differences in perceived acceptance of a modified Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) model for health care.
【24h】

The differences in perceived acceptance of a modified Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) model for health care.

机译:修改后的高级产品质量计划(APQP)模型用于卫生保健的感知接受程度之间的差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The health care industry has been slow to embrace traditional systems engineering tools, which have proven effective in manufacturing and other industries in developing services and delivery systems. There is a perception that these traditional engineering tools, methods, and processes are not applicable to health care.;A Delphi panel of 14 experts gathered to identify which Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) tools are applicable in health care. Secondly, this study aimed to reach consensus on additional tools that if added, would make the APQP model more likely to meet the needs of the health care industry. The resultant of the Delphi exercise is the Advanced Quality Planning for Health Care (AQPH) model.;The Delphi panel of experts consented on 48 tools. An Internet survey sent to the American Society for Quality Health Care Division (ASQ-HCD) collected data on the differences in perceived acceptance of the AQPH model. One hundred and thirty-eight ASQ-HCD members completed the Internet survey. A T-Test measured differences in perceived acceptance amongst the groups. There was no statistically significant difference (p=.530, infinity=.05) in perception of the AQPH model between ASQ-HCD certified members and non-certified members. There also was no statistically significant difference (p=.758, infinity=.05) in perception of the AQPH model between ASQ-HCD members holding clinical and non-clinical positions. Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference ( p=.416, infinity=.05) in perception of the AQPH model between ASQ-HCD members with less than 20 years of experience and members with 20 years or more experience.
机译:医疗保健行业对传统的系统工程工具的接受一直很缓慢,传统的系统工程工具已被证明在制造业和其他行业中有效地开发服务和交付系统。人们认为这些传统的工程工具,方法和过程不适用于医疗保健。;由14位专家组成的Delphi小组聚集在一起,以确定哪些高级产品质量计划(APQP)工具适用于医疗保健。其次,本研究旨在就其他工具达成共识,如果添加其他工具,则将使APQP模型更可能满足医疗保健行业的需求。 Delphi练习的结果是高级卫生保健质量计划(AQPH)模型。; Delphi专家小组同意了48种工具。发送给美国质量卫生保健协会(ASQ-HCD)的一项互联网调查收集了有关AQPH模型被接受程度差异的数据。 138名ASQ-HCD成员完成了互联网调查。 T检验测量了各组之间的感知接受度差异。在ASQ-HCD认证成员和非认证成员之间对AQPH模型的感知上没有统计学上的显着差异(p = .530,无穷大= .05)。持有临床和非临床职位的ASQ-HCD成员之间对AQPH模型的知觉也没有统计学上的显着差异(p = .758,infinity = .05)。此外,经验不足20年的ASQ-HCD成员与经验超过20年的成员之间在对AQPH模型的感知上没有统计学上的显着差异(p = .416,infinity = .05)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Schneider, Richard A.;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana State University.;

  • 授予单位 Indiana State University.;
  • 学科 Engineering Industrial.;Engineering System Science.;Health Sciences General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 225 p.
  • 总页数 225
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号