首页> 外文学位 >Corporate social responsibility in the Canadian extractive sector Bill C-300: What went wrong?
【24h】

Corporate social responsibility in the Canadian extractive sector Bill C-300: What went wrong?

机译:加拿大采掘业的企业社会责任Bill C-300:出了什么问题?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

While the mining industry provides numerous benefits to the society, it also has negative impacts on communities. This thesis will discuss various voluntary policies employed by mining companies and the developmental attempts at legislative changes to enforce mandatory regulations. The primary focus will be on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), in particular Bill C-300, which required "Corporate Accountability for the Activities of Mining, Oil or Gas Corporations in Developing Countries". The Bill had effective key points to ensure that Canadian extractive companies followed human rights and environmental practices while operating overseas. Although the Bill was defeated, it is believed to be critical with respect to CSR. Moreover, Dodd-Frank, the 2010 United States legislation with similar provisions of CSR, will be discussed. The differences in the two will be elaborated to determine why Bill C-300 was rejected and answer whether it would have succeeded had the provisions been drafted similarly to Dodd-Frank.
机译:采矿业为社会带来了许多好处,同时也对社区产生了负面影响。本文将讨论矿业公司采用的各种自愿性政策,以及为执行强制性法规而进行立法变更的尝试。主要重点将放在企业社会责任(CSR)上,尤其是C-300法案,该法案要求“对发展中国家的矿业,石油或天然气公司的活动进行企业问责”。该法案具有有效的关键点,以确保加拿大的采掘公司在海外经营时遵循人权和环境惯例。尽管该法案被否决,但据信对于企业社会责任至关重要。此外,还将讨论多德-弗兰克(Dodd-Frank),这是2010年美国企业社会责任类似条款的立法。将详细说明两者之间的区别,以确定为什么拒绝C-300法案,并回答如果条款的起草方式与多德-弗兰克类似,该法案是否会成功。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tahir, Mariam.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 Law.;Environmental law.;International law.
  • 学位 LL.M.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 74 p.
  • 总页数 74
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号