首页> 外文学位 >Repression and the Civil-War Life-Cycle: Explaining the Use and Effect of Repression Before, During, and After Civil War.
【24h】

Repression and the Civil-War Life-Cycle: Explaining the Use and Effect of Repression Before, During, and After Civil War.

机译:镇压和内战的生命周期:解释内战之前,期间和之后镇压的使用和效果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The central goal of this project is to better understand the relationship between civil war and repression at each phase of the "civil-war life-cycle," which is composed of the escalation and onset of civil war, the war itself, and the post-war period.;The project then seeks to understand the role of repression in civil war onset, where repression is argued to be either a permissive condition or a direct cause of civil war, where the role of repression is tied to what type of civil war occurs. As a permissive condition, repression essentially provides the opportunity for a group to carry out an attack, invasion, mutiny, and the like. During other conflicts, repression may be a direct cause of the war. The repression of protest movements may lead those groups to view "normal," non-violent political channels as closed, while also increasing grievances and therefore their willingness to fight. This direct mechanism along with the escalation process that leads to civil war is explored in depth, using data from the 2011 Arab Spring.;This project also seeks to explain when conflicts are likely to be accompanied by harsh repression and the targeting of civilians, and to address whether that strategy is effective. It is argued that insurgencies rely on civilian populations for material and non-material support; if the government targets this resource pool then it may be able to undercut that lifeline and thus the military effectiveness of the group. Yet, as repression is costly this is only a strategy likely to be employed when the rebels are gaining ground, when they are relatively strong and militarily effective. As such, governments that employ repression as a war-time strategy are likely beginning from a point of weakness or disadvantage. It is thus further argued that the "gamble" of repression is not likely to reverse the government's fortunes; rather, wars marked by high levels of repression are most likely to end in stalemate.;Finally, the use of, or the restraint from using, repression in post-war periods is also explored. Little attention has thus far been paid to the use of repression in post-conflict states, despite the growing literature on the consequences of conflict and the importance of this time for rebuilding and establishing peace. Here, the transformation of the war-time threat, together with various constraints against using repression in the post-war period, are considered.
机译:该项目的主要目标是更好地了解“内战生命周期”每个阶段的内战与镇压之间的关系,内战由内战的升级和爆发,战争本身以及战争的后期阶段组成。战争时期。;然后该项目试图了解镇压在南北战争爆发中的作用,其中镇压被认为是内战的一种允许条件或直接原因,其中镇压的作用与内战类型有关战争发生了。作为一种允许的条件,镇压本质上为团体提供了进行进攻,入侵,叛变等的机会。在其他冲突中,镇压可能是战争的直接原因。镇压抗议运动可能会导致这些团体将“正常的”,非暴力的政治渠道视为封闭的,同时也增加了不满情绪,因此也增加了他们的战斗意愿。使用2011年阿拉伯之春的数据对这种直接机制以及导致内战的升级进程进行了深入探讨;该项目还试图解释何时冲突可能伴随着严厉镇压和针对平民的袭击,以及解决该策略是否有效。据认为,叛乱活动依靠平民人口提供物质和非物质支持;如果政府以这个资源库为目标,那么它可能会削弱生命线,从而削弱该组织的军事效力。然而,由于镇压成本高昂,这仅是叛军在巩固势力并在军事上有效时发扬光大的一种可能的策略。因此,将镇压作为战时策略的政府可能从弱点或劣势开始。因此,人们进一步认为,镇压的“赌博”不可能扭转政府的命运。相反,以高度镇压为特征的战争最有可能在僵局中结束。最后,还探讨了战后时期对镇压的使用或限制。尽管有越来越多的关于冲突后果以及这段时间对重建和建立和平的重要性的文献报道,但迄今为止在冲突后国家很少使用压制。在这里,考虑了战时威胁的转变以及战后时期对使用镇压的各种限制。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ryckman, Kirssa Cline.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Arizona.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Arizona.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 252 p.
  • 总页数 252
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号