首页> 外文学位 >Tourism destination competitiveness, globalization, and strategic development from a development economics perspective.
【24h】

Tourism destination competitiveness, globalization, and strategic development from a development economics perspective.

机译:从发展经济学的角度看旅游目的地的竞争力,全球化和战略发展。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The dissertation aims to propose a tourism destination competitiveness model to help tourism policy makers in different country groups acknowledge relevant factors given their unique situational characteristics with regard to globalization and economic development. Studies on tourism destination competitiveness (TDC) have emerged to explain how tourism destinations can achieve competitiveness and enhance economic and social development. Although tourism literature has developed conceptual tourism competitiveness models, few studies have conducted empirical tests and these studies have not proposed TDC models that take into account the context of destinations, such as the impact of globalization and the level of economic development.;Therefore, this study aims to empirically test a structural equation model of tourism destination competitiveness from the development economics perspective. The proposed research model explores the impacts of hypothesized determinants on TDC and the relationship between TDC and socioeconomic prosperity at the national level. Four main factors of tourism competitiveness are proposed: core resources/attractions, complementary conditions, destination management, and demand conditions. This study adds globalization as a main factor of tourism destination competitiveness and tests the economic development as a moderating effect, extending previous TDC models. The hypothesized measurement models of each determinant (exogenous construct) and dependent latent variable (endogenous construct) of tourism competitiveness, and the structural model are tested using Partial Least Square (PLS) path modeling with 139 cases of countries/economies. Additionally, the moderating effect of economic development is tested by Partial Least Square (PLS) - Multiple Group Analysis (MGA).;This empirical study suggests several important implications according to findings. First, the findings suggest that the main determinants of TDC include globalization as a main factor of TDC. The results suggest that the main determinants of TDC are core resources/attractions, destination management, and globalization in both high-income and low-income country groups. However, the degree of impact of the three determinants was different across the two groups of countries. For the high-income country group, the core resources/attractions had the strongest impact on TDC, while for the low-income country group globalization measured by the net inflow of FDI had the strongest impact on TDC. This finding provides strong empirical support for this study’s assertion that the TDC framework should be extended to account for economic globalization as a main factor, especially in developing and less developed countries.;Second, this study suggests that there is a difference in the impact of determinants on TDC across two income-level country groups, confirming the moderating effect of economic development. The difference in the degree of impacts of core resources/attractions was supported. The effect of core resources/attractions on TDC was greater in the high-income country group than in the low-income country group. This finding suggests that the strategy of enhancing resources and attractions to improve TDC might be more effective for developed countries than for developing or less-developed ones. On the other hand, for the low-income country group the priority should be given to the policy of FDI over other factors of TDC.;Third, in contrast to the conceptual TDC models, complementary conditions representing tourism infrastructure and general infrastructure were not supported as a main determinant of TDC in both income country groups. While the previous literature has suggested that demand condition of a country is an important factor to enhance competitiveness, this empirical study did not support this argument. It implies that the conceptual TDC models need to be refined or calls for further research on the relationship of complementary conditions and domestic demand conditions with TDC.;Lastly, the finding shows that there is a positive relationship between TDC and socioeconomic prosperity in both groups. This suggests that tourism competitiveness contributes to the standard of living of residents in the destination supporting the tourism-led growth hypothesis.;The main contributions of this study are as follows: First, from the results of comprehensive data analysis, this study contributes to the transformation from a definitional model to an explanatory model of tourism destination competitiveness by exploring the structural relationships between all constructs, tourism competitiveness, and the standard of living; second, this study contributes to expanding the current TDC model by adding the global perspective to explain the structural relationships. This study shows that economic globalization plays a critical role in both high-income and low-income countries; third, the results of this study contribute to the implementation of optimal policies in order to enhance global tourism competitiveness to fit a nation’s stage of economic development.
机译:本文旨在提出一个旅游目的地竞争力模型,以帮助不同国家的旅游决策者认识到相关因素,因为它们具有全球化和经济发展的独特情况特征。关于旅游目的地竞争力(TDC)的研究已经出现,以解释旅游目的地如何实现竞争力并促进经济和社会发展。尽管旅游文献已经开发出概念性的旅游竞争力模型,但很少有研究进行实证检验,并且这些研究还没有提出考虑目的地国背景的TDC模型,例如全球化的影响和经济发展水平。本研究旨在从发展经济学的角度对旅游目的地竞争力的结构方程模型进行实证检验。拟议的研究模型探讨了假设因素对贸易壁垒的影响以及在国家层面上贸易壁垒与社会经济繁荣之间的关系。提出了旅游业竞争力的四个主要因素:核心资源/吸引力,互补条件,目的地管理和需求条件。这项研究将全球化作为旅游目的地竞争力的主要因素,并通过对经济发展的调节作用来检验经济发展,从而扩展了以前的TDC模型。利用偏最小二乘(PLS)路径模型对139个国家/地区经济体的旅游竞争力的每个决定因素(外生构造)和因变量(内生构造)的假设测量模型和结构模型进行了检验。此外,通过偏最小二乘(PLS)-多组分析(MGA)检验了经济发展的调节作用。该实证研究根据发现提出了一些重要的含义。首先,调查结果表明,TDC的主要决定因素包括全球化作为TDC的主要因素。结果表明,TDC的主要决定因素是高收入和低收入国家组的核心资源/吸引力,目的地管理和全球化。但是,这三个决定因素的影响程度在两组国家之间是不同的。对于高收入国家组来说,核心资源/吸引力对贸发会议的影响最大,而对于低收入国家组来说,以外国直接投资净流入衡量的全球化对贸发中心的影响最大。这一发现为这项研究的主张提供了强有力的实证支持,即贸发会议的框架应扩展到将经济全球化作为主要因素考虑在内,特别是在发展中国家和欠发达国家中。;其次,该研究表明,经济全球化的影响存在差异两个收入水平的国家/地区对贸发会议的决定因素,证实了经济发展的调节作用。支持了核心资源/吸引力影响程度的差异。高收入国家组的核心资源/吸引力对TDC的影响大于低收入国家组。这一发现表明,增加资源和吸引力以改善贸发会议的战略对发达国家而言可能比对发展中国家或欠发达国家更为有效。另一方面,对于低收入国家组,应优先考虑外国直接投资的政策,而不要考虑贸易条件发展委员会的其他因素。第三,与概念性贸易条件发展模型相反,不支持代表旅游基础设施和一般基础设施的互补条件是两个收入国家组中TDC的主要决定因素。虽然先前的文献表明,一个国家的需求状况是增强竞争力的重要因素,但这项实证研究并不支持这一论点。这意味着需要完善概念性的贸易发展中的贸易模型,或者需要进一步研究贸易条件对贸易互补性和内需条件之间的关系。最后,研究结果表明,贸易发展中贸易与社会经济繁荣之间存在正相关关系。这表明旅游业竞争力有助于目的地居民的生活水平,支持旅游业主导的增长假说。本研究的主要贡献如下:首先,从综合数据分析的结果来看,本研究有助于通过探索所有构造,旅游竞争力和生活水平之间的结构关系,将旅游目的地竞争力的定义模型转变为解释性模型;其次,本研究通过增加解释结构关系的全局视角,有助于扩展当前的TDC模型。这项研究表明,经济全球化在高收入和低收入国家中都起着至关重要的作用。第三,这项研究的结果有助于实施最佳政策,以增强全球旅游竞争力以适应一个国家的经济发展阶段。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kim, Namhyun.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;

  • 授予单位 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;
  • 学科 Economics General.;Recreation.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 151 p.
  • 总页数 151
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:43:41

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号