首页> 外文学位 >A comparison of illegal insider trading in Canada and post-communist China: Globalized market economy and the role of law.
【24h】

A comparison of illegal insider trading in Canada and post-communist China: Globalized market economy and the role of law.

机译:加拿大和后共产主义中国的非法内幕交易比较:全球化的市场经济和法律的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Although insider trading is a worldwide problem, researchers in criminology have conducted surprisingly little research on this topic. This dissertation examines insider trading regulation in Canada and China from a socio-legal perspective. The purpose of the study is to compare the social, political, economic, and legal origins of insider trading regulations and their enforcement in the two countries.A major finding of the study is the paucity of insider trading cases and the lack of convictions for insider trading offences in both countries. Chinese insider trading regulation is more government-run, while the Canadian regulatory scheme is more industry and market oriented. In both cases, the threat of severe penalties should not be considered automatically effective. Canada and China have similarly lenient insider trading law enforcement. As the infrequency of insider trading cases in the two countries shows, the absence of a regular and consistent enforcement of the law is also a significant problem both in China and in Canada. A primary challenge to enforcement comes from the fact that insider trading cases are too difficult to detect and prove in court. In addition, the relationship between the government officials and corporations is close and strong in both countries, though in different ways. The effectiveness of anti-insider trading provisions will arguably depend, in part, upon how the regulatory authorities charged with their administration conduct their work.The dissertation begins with a historical account of insider trading legislation and policies in Canada (since the Kimber Report of 1965--66) and China (since the Provisional Measures Controlling Securities Firms of 1990). The central focus of this dissertation is on insider trading enforcement mechanisms. Major administrative and court cases are discussed in detail to illustrate how the insider trading offence is constructed in the different contexts of the established capitalist system in Canada and the "socialist market economy" in China, and how the securities regulatory commissions in the two jurisdictions have worked to enforce insider trading laws.
机译:尽管内幕交易是一个全球性的问题,但犯罪学研究人员却很少对此问题进行过令人惊讶的研究。本文从社会法律角度考察了加拿大和中国的内幕交易法规。该研究的目的是比较内幕交易法规的社会,政治,经济和法律渊源以及在这两个国家的执行情况。研究的主要发现是内幕交易案件少且对内幕交易者缺乏信念两国都有贸易违法行为。中国的内幕交易监管更多是政府管理的,而加拿大的监管计划则更多是针对行业和市场的。在这两种情况下,不应将重罚的威胁自动视为有效。加拿大和中国的内幕交易执法同样宽松。正如两国内幕交易案件的频率不高所表明的那样,无论是在中国还是在加拿大,缺乏定期和一致的法律执行都是一个重大问题。执法的主要挑战来自于内幕交易案件很难在法庭上发现和证明的事实。此外,两国政府官员与公司之间的关系密切而牢固,尽管方式不同。反内幕交易条款的有效性在一定程度上取决于监管机构负责其行政工作的方式。论文始于加拿大内幕交易立法和政策的历史解释(自1965年《金伯报告》以来) --66)和中国(自1990年颁布的《管制证券公司的暂行措施》)。本文的重点是内幕交易执行机制。详细讨论了主要的行政和法院案件,以说明如何在加拿大既有的资本主义体系和中国的“社会主义市场经济”的不同背景下构造内幕交易犯罪,以及两个司法管辖区的证券监管委员会如何致力于执行内幕交易法律。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cheng, Hongming.;

  • 作者单位

    Simon Fraser University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Simon Fraser University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Economics Finance.Sociology Criminology and Penology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 267 p.
  • 总页数 267
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 能源与动力工程;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:43:40

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号