首页> 外文学位 >An historical perspective on the Accrediting Council on Education in Journalism and Mass Communications from 1986--2003: Examination of the impact on curriculum.
【24h】

An historical perspective on the Accrediting Council on Education in Journalism and Mass Communications from 1986--2003: Examination of the impact on curriculum.

机译:1986--2003年新闻与大众传播教育认可委员会的历史观点:审查对课程的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study provides an historical perspective of the accrediting practices and policies of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communications from 1986 to 2003 and the impact on the curriculum. The picture that emerges is one of a methodical organization which adapted policies to meet the needs of various constituents. The historical perspective used a research strategy of data triangulation to corroborate interviews from participants associated with the Council and primary and secondary documents. Internal and external factors led the Council to revise its diversity and curriculum policies. The accountability movement that swept the country in the late 1980s and 1990s resulted in a shift of the ACEJMC accrediting focus from a quantitative review of a program's human and physical resources, to qualitative evaluations promoting student learning. The study found that the organization's policies resulted in more liberal arts courses within the journalism and mass communication major. However, the impact of the Council's accrediting policies on diversity in the curriculum met limited success. The researcher concluded that ACEJMC is an organization responsive to the needs of its constituents because of an ability to adapt to the changing public and academic environments in which it operates. The research, however, also suggests that the organization's focus on specific policies meant that it failed to acknowledge the importance of at least one major issue facing the profession. The results of ACEJMC accrediting decisions on curriculum Standard 3 and diversity Standard 12 are presented, along with recommendations for future study.
机译:这项研究为1986年至2003年新闻与大众传播教育协会的认证做法和政策及其对课程的影响提供了历史视角。出现的情况是有条不紊的组织之一,该组织调整了政策以满足各种组成部分的需求。历史观点使用数据三角剖分的研究策略来证实来自与理事会以及主要和次要文件有关的参与者的采访。内部和外部因素导致理事会修改了其多样性和课程政策。在1980年代末期和1990年代席卷全国的问责制运动导致ACEJMC的认证重点从对计划的人力和物力资源的定量审查转变为促进学生学习的定性评估。研究发现,该组织的政策导致新闻和大众传播专业开设了更多的文科课程。但是,理事会认证政策对课程多样性的影响取得了有限的成功。研究人员得出结论,由于ACEJMC能够适应其工作人员不断变化的公共和学术环境,因此能够响应其选民的需求。但是,该研究还表明,该组织对特定政策的关注意味着它未能承认该行业面临的至少一个重大问题的重要性。介绍了课程标准3和多样性标准12的ACEJMC认证决定的结果,以及对未来学习的建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Whitmore, Evonne H.;

  • 作者单位

    Kent State University.;

  • 授予单位 Kent State University.;
  • 学科 Education Higher.; Education Administration.; Education History of.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 298 p.
  • 总页数 298
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 高等教育;教育;教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号