首页> 外文学位 >Studying social attention in different contexts: Are interactive measures of joint attention relatable to eye-tracking measures of social attention.
【24h】

Studying social attention in different contexts: Are interactive measures of joint attention relatable to eye-tracking measures of social attention.

机译:在不同背景下研究社会关注:共同关注的互动方式是否与社会关注的眼动追踪相关?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There are currently a variety of methods used in the literature to study social attention and it can sometimes be hard to truly know whether the results are comparable. This study gathered data from 30 20-month olds while they participated in two eye-tracking studies: one using semi-naturalistic videos of actors performing infant directed actions, viewed from a first-person perspective, and one using clips from children's cartoons. While recent studies using goal-directed actions have found more attention to objects (Boyer et al., 2015; Lischer & Bertenthal, unpublished), many previous studies have found more attention to faces, with attention to faces growing as infants got older (Frank, Vul & Johnson, 2009; Frank, Amso & Johnson, 2014). By using different types of stimuli, it may be possible to get a better understanding of why some studies may find differing results. The current study found that more attention was allocated to faces in the cartoon videos while more attention was allocated to objects in the goal-directed action videos. This study additionally compared the eye-tracking results with measures of interactive joint attention but did not find any significant correlations between the measures. This suggests that interactive measures of joint attention may not be comparable to eye-tracking measures of social attention.
机译:目前,文献中使用了多种方法来研究社会关注度,有时很难真正地知道结果是否具有可比性。这项研究收集了来自30个20个月大的婴儿的数据,而他们参与了两项眼动追踪研究:一项使用从第一人称视角观看演员表演婴儿定向动作的演员的半自然录像,另一项使用儿童动画片中的剪辑。虽然最近使用目标定向动作进行的研究发现更多地关注对象(Boyer等人,2015年; Lischer&Bertenthal,未发表),但许多先前的研究发现对面部的关注更多,随着婴儿年龄的增长对面部的关注也越来越多(Frank (Vul&Johnson,2009; Frank,Amso&Johnson,2014)。通过使用不同类型的刺激,可能会更好地理解为什么某些研究可能会发现不同的结果。当前的研究发现,在卡通视频中,更多的注意力分配给了面孔,而在目标导向的动作视频中,更多的注意力分配给了对象。这项研究另外将眼动追踪结果与互动式联合注意力的量度进行了比较,但并未发现量度之间的任何显着相关性。这表明共同关注的互动方式可能无法与社会关注的眼动追踪方式相提并论。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lischer, Caitlin A.;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana University.;

  • 授予单位 Indiana University.;
  • 学科 Developmental psychology.;Social psychology.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 68 p.
  • 总页数 68
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:43:20

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号