首页> 外文学位 >Congressional Interests in Making China Policy: An Analysis of the Post-Cold War Evolution of Congressional Policymaking toward China.
【24h】

Congressional Interests in Making China Policy: An Analysis of the Post-Cold War Evolution of Congressional Policymaking toward China.

机译:国会对华政策的利益:冷战后国会对华政策演变的分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The development of official Sino-U.S. relations during the Cold War occurred in the shadow of an assertive Soviet power, when Washington and Beijing found common geopolitical ground in opposing Soviet expansion and overlooked longstanding political disagreements. The Soviet demise, however, put the United States and China on a new geostrategic footing, and the changing international environment forced Washington to approach China policy in a different context. What explains the evolution of congressional policymaking in U.S. policy toward China since the end of the Cold War? My review of legislation vis-a-vis China since 1992 revealed that congressional policy can be divided into four main issue areas: cross-strait relations, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, human rights, and trade. Each chapter explored congressional policy in each area through floor voting to explain congressional interests, how congressional policymaking evolved, and what domestic political factors influenced this legislation. The conclusions of this study provide insight into congressional policymaking and its potential future evolution, because China's growth had a profound influence on legislation. When China was relatively weaker, Congress was much more assertive in: (1) pursuing a separate relationship with Taiwan, (2) confronting China's proliferation activities, and (3) targeting perceived unfair trade practices that blocked American access to Chinese markets. As China's strength grew, however, Congress became: (1) much less active in cross-strait policymaking, (2) less prone to naming China as a proliferator, and (3) more focused on protecting American markets. The only issue area that appeared immune from this effect was human rights policy. This dissertation also shed light on the influence of domestic political factors on congressional policymaking. The only factor that influenced all four issue areas was the interbranch rivalry. Elections affected policymaking in cross-strait and trade policy, and partisan competition influenced policymaking in proliferation and human rights policy. These findings indicate that, while the struggle over policy control will generally affect congressional policymaking in all issue areas, upcoming elections are more likely to affect cross-strait relations and trade policy, and a politically divided White House and Congress are more likely to affect proliferation and human rights policy.
机译:冷战期间中美官方关系的发展是在一个自信的苏联大国的阴影下发生的,当时华盛顿和北京在反对苏维埃扩张中找到了共同的地缘政治基础,而忽视了长期以来的政治分歧。然而,苏联的灭亡使美国和中国处于新的地缘战略基础上,不断变化的国际环境迫使华盛顿在不同背景下采取对华政策。自冷战结束以来,美国对华政策中国会政策制定的演变如何解释?自1992年以来,我对中国的立法回顾表明,国会政策可分为四个主要问题领域:两岸关系,大规模杀伤性武器扩散,人权和贸易。每章都通过投票表决探索了每个地区的国会政策,以解释国会利益,国会政策制定的演变方式以及哪些国内政治因素影响了这项立法。由于中国的增长对立法产生了深远的影响,本研究的结论为国会的决策制定及其潜在的未来发展提供了见识。当中国相对薄弱时,国会在以下方面则更加自信:(1)与台湾建立单独的关系;(2)对抗中国的扩散活动;(3)针对阻碍美国进入中国市场的不正当贸易行为。然而,随着中国实力的增强,国会变得:(1)在两岸政策制定中不那么活跃;(2)不太倾向于将中国命名为扩散国;(3)更多地致力于保护美国市场。唯一不受此影响的问题领域是人权政策。本文还揭示了国内政治因素对国会决策的影响。影响所有四个问题领域的唯一因素是部门间的竞争。选举影响了两岸和贸易政策的决策,党派竞争影响了扩散和人权政策的决策。这些发现表明,尽管围绕政策控制的斗争通常会影响所有议题领域的国会决策,但即将举行的选举更有可能影响两岸关系和贸易政策,政治分裂的白宫和国会更可能影响扩散和人权政策。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gagliano, Joseph A.;

  • 作者单位

    Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy (Tufts University).;

  • 授予单位 Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy (Tufts University).;
  • 学科 Political Science International Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 236 p.
  • 总页数 236
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:43:16

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号