首页> 外文学位 >Regressing forward: Army adaptability and animal power during World War II.
【24h】

Regressing forward: Army adaptability and animal power during World War II.

机译:退步:第二次世界大战期间的军队适应性和动物力量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

America forged a successful way of war that relied on adaptation, and this trait was not simply an adjunct to industrial might as a reason why the Allies won World War II. An American penchant for organization and corporate management allowed for mass production of war material, which clearly contributed to Axis defeat. However, to claim that the Axis Powers were merely overwhelmed by an avalanche of weapons and supply is reductionist.;This dissertation contends that adaptability was as much an American way of war as mass production and overwhelming firepower. The particular nature of American adaptability and its contribution to Allied victory are exhibited in the Army's use of animal power during a conflict synonymous with mechanized warfare and advanced technology. The application of pre-modern technology in a modern, machine-driven war was not archaic. On the contrary, the nature of American adaptability allowed the Army to move forward by retreating down a culturally constructed hierarchy of modernity and employing the traditional mode of animal transportation. The Army's technological regression from motors to mules in North Africa, the Mediterranean, and China-Burma-India during World War II is the focus of this work.;Americans possessed material abundance in campaigns across Western Europe and the Central Pacific in 1944 and 1945, as German and Japanese prisoners attested. Mountains of artillery shells, fuel, and food, however, did not exist in the backwater "sideshows." American military success on the periphery was not due to material abundance, nor to a greater sense of determination. America won the backwater campaigns because the nature of American adaptability was cultivated over the centuries and converted from a way of life to an American way of war.
机译:美国开创了一种依靠适应的成功战争方式,而这种特质不仅是工业力量的辅助,也是盟国赢得第二次世界大战的原因。美国人对组织和公司管理的偏爱允许大量生产战争物资,这显然导致了轴心国的失败。然而,宣称轴心国只是被大量的雪崩武器和供应所淹没是减少主义。这篇论文认为,适应性与大规模生产和压倒性的火力一样,是美国的战争方式。美国的适应能力的特殊性质及其对盟军胜利的贡献体现在陆军在机械化战争和先进技术的冲突中对动物力量的使用。前现代技术在现代机器驱动的战争中的应用并不是过时的。相反,美国适应性的本质使陆军通过退缩文化上建构的现代等级制度并采用传统的动物运输方式而前进。第二次世界大战期间,陆军在北非,地中海和中缅印度从汽车到motors子的技术回归是这项工作的重点。美国人在1944年和1945年的整个西欧和中太平洋的战役中拥有丰富的物质,正如德国和日本战俘所证明的那样。然而,死水的“边秀”中不存在大炮弹,燃料和食物。美国在周边地区的军事成功不是由于物质丰富,也不是因为更大的决心感。美国赢得了这场死水运动,因为美国适应能力的本性在几个世纪中得到了培养,并从生活方式转变为美国战争方式。

著录项

  • 作者

    Martin, Jason C.;

  • 作者单位

    Kansas State University.;

  • 授予单位 Kansas State University.;
  • 学科 History Modern.;History United States.;History Military.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 285 p.
  • 总页数 285
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号