首页> 外文学位 >Creation and evaluation of composite measures of physician practice quality using aggregated health insurance claims.
【24h】

Creation and evaluation of composite measures of physician practice quality using aggregated health insurance claims.

机译:使用汇总的健康保险索赔创建和评估医师执业质量的综合指标。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study uses mixed-methods to study composite measures of physician practice quality. First, using qualitative interview data, this study describes the opinions of stakeholders related to the utility and development of composite measures. Also, using aggregated health insurance claims, this study investigates a number of important properties of composite measures. First, the study investigates whether multiple measures of physician practice quality conform to a latent factor structure that can be used to create composite measures. Second, the study will also test the extent to which different techniques used to calculate composite measures lead to differences in physician practice ratings. Third, the study will also test the stability of physician practice quality measurement and the extent to which composite measures may improve that stability.;The findings raise fundamental questions about the potential utility of composite measures. Particularly, based on the data available in this setting, a single unidimensional measure of physician practice quality should not be created, significantly limiting the potential uses of composite measures. This would suggest that composite developers in other settings should use similar factor analytic approaches to determine if a single unidimensional measure might be appropriate. However, if unidimensional measures cannot be created, the potential utility of composite measures is greatly diminished. Also, composite measures address very few of the concerns stakeholders had related to physician quality measurement, and they did very little to address a specific potential application of composite measures related to data lags. Although composite measures likely still hold some utility related to improving decision making by consumers and health plans, more time should be focused on addressing more fundamental issues with quality reports that cannot be addressed by composite measures.
机译:本研究使用混合方法来研究医师执业质量的综合指标。首先,使用定性访谈数据,本研究描述了利益相关者与综合措施的实用性和发展有关的观点。此外,使用汇总的健康保险索赔,本研究调查了综合措施的许多重要属性。首先,该研究调查了医师执业质量的多种测量是否符合可用于创建综合测量的潜在因素结构。其次,该研究还将测试用于计算综合量度的不同技术导致医师执业等级差异的程度。第三,该研究还将测试医师执业质量测量的稳定性,以及复合措施可在多大程度上改善这种稳定性。研究结果提出了有关复合措施潜在用途的根本问题。特别是,基于此设置中可用的数据,不应创建医师执业质量的单一一维测量,从而显着限制了复合测量的潜在用途。这表明在其他情况下的复合开发人员应使用类似的因子分析方法来确定单个单维度量是否合适。但是,如果无法创建单维度量,则复合度量的潜在效用将大大降低。此外,综合度量标准几乎解决了利益相关者与医师质量度量有关的问题,而对于解决与数据滞后相关的综合度量标准的特定潜在应用却很少。尽管综合措施可能仍具有与改善消费者和健康计划的决策有关的效用,但应将更多的时间集中在利用综合措施无法解决的质量报告来解决更基本的问题上。

著录项

  • 作者

    Martsolf, Grant R.;

  • 作者单位

    The Pennsylvania State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Pennsylvania State University.;
  • 学科 Health care management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 195 p.
  • 总页数 195
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号