首页> 外文学位 >Soil erosion risk and mitigation through crop rotation on organic and conventional cropping systems.
【24h】

Soil erosion risk and mitigation through crop rotation on organic and conventional cropping systems.

机译:通过有机耕作和常规耕作系统上的作物轮作,降低土壤侵蚀的风险。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Organic cropping systems are often accused of increasing soil erosion risk through an increased use of tillage for weed control. However, little research has been conducted in Canada regarding soil erosion risk on organic farms. It is known that crop rotations can be used to ameliorate a variety of agronomic problems encountered in cropping systems, including soil erosion. Organic systems, which do not use synthetic pesticides and fertilizers, rely more heavily on crop rotations than conventional systems to solve agronomic problems such as weeds and insects. The objective of this study was to compare cropping practices (including crop rotations and tillage regime) on organic and conventional cropping systems, and examine the effect of crop rotation (annual-, biennial-, or perennial-containing rotations) and management (organic or conventional) on soil properties relating to wind and water erosion risk. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
机译:人们常常指责有机耕作制度通过增加耕作来控制杂草而增加了土壤侵蚀的风险。但是,在加拿大,关于有机农场土壤侵蚀风险的研究很少。众所周知,轮作可以用来减轻包括土壤侵蚀在内的农作系统中遇到的各种农学问题。与传统系统相比,不使用合成农药和化肥的有机系统更加依赖农作物轮作来解决杂草和昆虫等农艺问题。这项研究的目的是比较有机耕作和常规耕作系统上的耕作方式(包括轮作和耕作制度),并检查轮作(一年一次,两年一次或多年生的轮作)和管理(有机或轮作)的影响。常规)的土壤特性与风蚀和水蚀的风险有关。 (摘要由UMI缩短。)

著录项

  • 作者

    Nelson, Alison G.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Manitoba (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Manitoba (Canada).;
  • 学科 Agriculture Agronomy.
  • 学位 M.Sc.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 147 p.
  • 总页数 147
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 农学(农艺学);
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号