首页> 外文学位 >Argument construction, argument evaluation, and decision-making: A content analysis of argumentation and debate textbooks.
【24h】

Argument construction, argument evaluation, and decision-making: A content analysis of argumentation and debate textbooks.

机译:论点构建,论点评估和决策:论据和辩论教科书的内容分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Critical thinking abilities, especially the advanced critical thinking abilities required for decision-making, are important to both individuals and democratic policymaking processes. Previous studies have indicated that argumentation and debate instruction can improve critical thinking abilities, but there are reasons to believe that current approaches are not as effective at developing decision-making ability as they could be, in part because they focus too heavily on argument construction, rather than argument evaluation and decision-making. In order to test which approaches to teaching argumentation and debate best encourage decision-making abilities, researchers need to know which elements are included in current argumentation and debate textbooks. No comprehensive reviews of the content of argumentation and debate textbooks exist, however, so it has not been possible to test and compare approaches.;A content analysis of 73 currently available argumentation and debate textbooks demonstrated that: (a) most textbooks provide students with the basics of argument construction, argumentation theory, and how to evaluate individual claims; (b) many textbooks provide students with important precursors for decision-making; (c) none of the textbooks provides a comprehensive approach to decision-making that includes a structure or framework for approaching evaluation, criteria awareness, reflexivity, and practice. The conclusions include recommendations for further research, textbook selection, textbook revisions, and for instructors to bridge current gaps in textbook coverage with their own material.
机译:批判性思维能力,特别是决策所需的高级批判性思维能力,对个人和民主决策过程均至关重要。先前的研究表明,辩论和辩论指导可以提高批判性思维能力,但是有理由相信,当前的方法在发展决策能力方面并不如应有的那样有效,部分原因是它们过于关注论点的构建,而不是论证评估和决策。为了测试哪种论证和辩论教学方法最能激发决策能力,研究人员需要知道当前论证和辩论教科书中包含哪些要素。但是,由于没有对论证和辩论教科书的内容进行全面的审查,因此无法测试和比较方法。;对当前可用的73种论证和辩论教科书的内容分析表明:(a)大多数教科书为学生提供了论证建构的基础,论证理论以及如何评估个人主张; (b)许多教科书为学生提供了重要的决策依据; (c)教科书中没有一个提供全面的决策方法,包括进行评估,标准意识,反思性和实践的结构或框架。结论包括对进一步研究,教科书选择,教科书修订的建议,以及指导教师用他们自己的材料弥补当前教科书覆盖率差距的建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Butt, Neil.;

  • 作者单位

    Wayne State University.;

  • 授予单位 Wayne State University.;
  • 学科 Speech Communication.;Education Curriculum and Instruction.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 189 p.
  • 总页数 189
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:36:47

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号