首页> 外文学位 >Learning Style Differences in Adult Students' Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Classroom Techniques for Teaching Quantitative Skills.
【24h】

Learning Style Differences in Adult Students' Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Classroom Techniques for Teaching Quantitative Skills.

机译:成年学生对课堂技能对定量技能教学效果的感知方面的学习风格差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

More than half of adults in the USA have quantitative literacy ratings at or below a basic level. This lack of literacy often becomes a barrier to employability. To overcome this barrier, adults are returning to college to improve their quantitative skills and complete an undergraduate education, often through an accelerated degree program. A problem, however, is that educators lack an understanding regarding how differences in learning style may affect the modality that adult students perceive as effective for developing quantitative skills in the accelerated format. A nonexperimental, causal-comparative design was conducted to examine modality effectiveness based on learning style. 7 2-day workshops were given which resulted in a sample of 46 valid responses. Adult learning style type was determined using the Kolb Learning Style Inventory. Modality effectiveness was measured using a Likert format survey. Multivariate analysis of variance showed that, when delivery and concept modalities were integrated within the workshop presentation, there was no significant difference in perceived effectiveness based on learning style type. However, when learning style was measured as a continuous variable, regression analysis showed a statistically significant relationship between learning style and the effectiveness of the reading modality, which took place outside the workshop. These findings support the importance of integrating modalities when presenting quantitative concepts to adults with diverse learning styles. Implications for positive social change include improvements in quantitative literacy that may reduce employment barriers.
机译:在美国,超过一半的成年人对基本读写能力的评估达到或低于基本水平。缺乏读写能力常常成为就业能力的障碍。为了克服这一障碍,成年人通常通过加速学位课程重返大学,以提高其定量技能并完成本科教育。但是,问题是,教育者对学习风格的差异可能如何影响成年学生认为对加速形式的定量技能有效的学习方式的理解不足。进行了一项非实验性的因果比较设计,以基于学习风格检查模态效果。举办了7个为期2天的研讨会,得出了46个有效回复的样本。成人学习风格类型是使用Kolb学习风格清单确定的。使用李克特格式调查来评估模态有效性。对方差的多变量分析表明,当在讲习班的演示文稿中整合交付和概念模式时,基于学习风格类型的感知效果没有显着差异。但是,当将学习风格作为连续变量进行衡量时,回归分析显示出学习风格与阅读方式的有效性之间存在统计学上的显着关系,这种关系发生在研讨会之外。这些发现支持了在向具有不同学习风格的成年人介绍量化概念时整合模式的重要性。对积极的社会变革的影响包括定量识字能力的提高,这可能会减少就业障碍。

著录项

  • 作者

    Deever, Walter Thomas.;

  • 作者单位

    Walden University.;

  • 授予单位 Walden University.;
  • 学科 Education Adult and Continuing.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 134 p.
  • 总页数 134
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:42:58

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号