首页> 外文学位 >Adaptation of Chinese graduate students to the academic integrity requirements of a U.S. university: A mixed methods research.
【24h】

Adaptation of Chinese graduate students to the academic integrity requirements of a U.S. university: A mixed methods research.

机译:使中国研究生适应美国大学的学术诚信要求:混合方法研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this mixed method study was to investigate how graduates originating from mainland China adapt to the U.S. academic integrity requirements. In the first, quantitative phase of the study, the research questions focused on understanding the state of academic integrity in China. This guiding question was divided into two sub-questions, academic misbehavior commonly practiced by students in China and factors leading to these types of misbehavior. The data were collected via a web-based survey (N=300) through convenience sampling. The results from the quantitative analysis displayed the commonly practiced academic misbehavior converge on four categories: a) cheating for benefits, b) plagiarism, c) exploiting academic resources, and d) falsifying one's work. Most factors appeared significant in leading to the misbehavior in the colleges in China. The quantitative analysis aimed to provide the contextual knowledge for the qualitative phase.;The second, qualitative portion used grounded theory to code the data. Three big themes emerged out of the data: a) the Chinese academic worldview, b) the Chinese academic context, and c) how Chinese graduate students learn U.S. academic ethics. In further analysis, sub-themes emerged out of every theme. The Chinese academic worldview was divided into: a) the lack of a contractual binding, b) ethical issues not part of value system, c) the lack of reporting culture. The Chinese academic context was divided into: a) not taught about scholar ethics, b) poor supervision, and c) lack of a sanctioning mechanism. The theme of learning academic ethics in the U.S. was divided into: a) requirements of academic integrity in U.S., b) motives of Chinese graduate students to adapt to U.S. academic ethics, and c) learning U.S. academic ethics. Two assumptions were then partly supported by the research findings that China differs from the U.S. in terms of academic ethics and institutions in China are homogeneous regarding academic integrity requirements. A model was formulated based on research findings in the qualitative phase through one acculturation theory.;Finally, the implications for future research and practice were discussed. Several suggestions were presented to help relevant U.S. institutions of higher learning enhance the effectiveness of current programs in fostering Chinese graduate students' awareness of academic integrity.
机译:这项混合方法研究的目的是调查来自中国大陆的毕业生如何适应美国的学术诚信要求。在研究的第一个定量阶段,研究问题着重于了解中国的学术诚信状况。该指导性问题分为两个子问题,即中国学生通常会实施的学术不端行为以及导致此类不端行为的因素。通过便利抽样,通过基于网络的调查(N = 300)收集数据。定量分析的结果显示,通常实践中的学术不端行为集中在四个类别上:a)欺骗利益,b)pla窃,c)开发学术资源和d)伪造自己的工作。在导致中国大学行为不端的大多数因素看来,这些因素都很重要。定量分析旨在为定性阶段提供上下文知识。第二个定性部分使用扎根理论对数据进行编码。数据中出现了三个大主题:a)中国学术世界观,b)中国学术背景,以及c)中国研究生如何学习美国学术道德。在进一步分析中,每个主题中都出现了子主题。中国的学术世界观分为:a)缺乏合同约束力,b)道德问题不属于价值体系,c)缺乏报告文化。中国的学术背景分为:a)没有讲授学者道德规范,b)监督不力,c)缺乏制裁机制。在美国,学习学术道德的主题分为:a)美国学术诚信的要求,b)中国研究生适应美国学术道德的动机,以及c)学习美国学术道德。研究结论部分支持了两个假设,即中国在学术道德方面与美国有所不同,而中国的机构在学术诚信要求方面是同质的。通过定性理论,根据定性阶段的研究成果建立了模型。最后,讨论了对未来研究和实践的意义。提出了一些建议,以帮助美国相关高等院校提高当前计划在培养中国研究生对学术诚信意识方面的有效性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jian, Hu.;

  • 作者单位

    Clemson University.;

  • 授予单位 Clemson University.;
  • 学科 Education Sociology of.;Ethics.;Education Higher Education Administration.;Education Leadership.;Education Higher.;Asian Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 237 p.
  • 总页数 237
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:43:02

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号