首页> 外文学位 >Analysis and assessment of an ergonomic computer chair.
【24h】

Analysis and assessment of an ergonomic computer chair.

机译:人体工学电脑椅的分析和评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The aim of this study was to assess and evaluate an ergonomic chair and also determine if the protocol used for this study should be recommended for evaluation of such chairs. Subjects (n = 30) were evaluated while carrying out 3 different computer related tasks to simulate routine activities the chair will be subjected to. A body discomfort survey and questionnaire were used to obtain subjective data from test subjects. Participants were asked to rate their general discomfort and discomfort at various anatomical locations on a scale of 0-10, indicating no discomfort and extreme discomfort respectively. An electromayograph (EMG) was used to measure and record muscle activity; Root Mean Square (RMS) values generated were used as objective data and analyzed accordingly. The Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) was used to evaluate the most dominant working postures to determine if the chair being assessed provided the appropriate support required to correct or prevent poor posture while carrying out computer related tasks. Using data collected, the 400-D hydraulic chair (Chair A) was compared to another randomly selected ergonomic chair (Chair B). A Comparison of chair A to chair B served as one of the methods used in analyzing the ergonomic chair. Differences in means and variances were noted in this study. No significant correlation could be established between population demographics, RMS values, and RULA scores (-0.6> r 0.6). It was determined that there was a difference in mean muscular activity of a smoker versus a non-smoker at the right flexor and right deltoid muscles. Results obtained from applying Fisher's and Tukey's methods of multiple comparison, showed that chair A produced a significant increase in discomfort at the lower back from start of the study to finish. A test for non-parametric data on the RMS values for chair A and chair B revealed significant differences between the two chairs at the left flexor, left deltoid, and lower back. An attempt was made to predict RMS values for eight different muscle groups given certain demographic information. Statistically significant relationships could not be established between subjective and objective data.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估和评估人体工学椅子,并确定是否应建议将用于本研究的方案推荐用于评估此类椅子。在执行3种不同的计算机相关任务以模拟椅子将要进行的日常活动时,对受试者(n = 30)进行了评估。使用身体不适调查和问卷调查来从测试对象中获取主观数据。要求参与者以0-10的等级对他们的一般不适和在各个解剖部位的不适进行评分,分别表示没有不适和极度不适。使用电may仪(EMG)来测量和记录肌肉活动。生成的均方根(RMS)值用作目标数据并进行相应分析。快速上肢评估(RULA)用于评估最主要的工作姿势,以确定被评估的椅子在执行计算机相关任务时是否提供了纠正或防止不良姿势所需的适当支持。使用收集到的数据,将400-D液压椅(椅子A)与另一个随机选择的人体工学椅子(椅子B)进行比较。椅子A与椅子B的比较是用于分析人体工学椅子的方法之一。在这项研究中指出了均值和方差的差异。人口统计学,RMS值和RULA得分之间未建立显着相关性(-0.6> r <0.6)。确定在右屈肌和右三角肌吸烟者与非吸烟者的平均肌肉活动存在差异。应用Fisher和Tukey的多重比较方法获得的结果表明,从研究开始到结束,椅子A在下背部的不适感明显增加。对椅子A和椅子B的RMS值的非参数数据进行的测试显示,左屈肌,左三角肌和下背部的两把椅子之间存在显着差异。尝试根据给定的人口统计信息预测八个不同肌肉组的RMS值。在主观和客观数据之间无法建立统计上显着的关系。

著录项

  • 作者

    Odo, Nkechinyere J.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Houston-Clear Lake.;

  • 授予单位 University of Houston-Clear Lake.;
  • 学科 Engineering Industrial.;Environmental Sciences.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 127 p.
  • 总页数 127
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:42:56

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号