首页> 外文学位 >The secular foundation of rulership: The political thought of Han Feizi (ca. 280--233 BC) and his predecessors.
【24h】

The secular foundation of rulership: The political thought of Han Feizi (ca. 280--233 BC) and his predecessors.

机译:统治的世俗基础:韩非子(约前280--233年)及其前任的政治思想。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines the popular view of four thinkers in Chinese Warring States period: Shen Dao, Shang Yang, Shen Buhai, and Han Feizi. They have been classified as Fajia. Specifically, Han Feizi has been known as a synthesizer of his predecessors on the basis of their three major tenets, Shang Yang's fa (written penal laws to regulate the people), Shen Buhai's shu (techniques to manipulate ministers), and Shen Dao's shi (power or authority). The first half part of this dissertation deals with three forerunners of Han Feizi in order to explore whether shi, shu, and fa are the major tenets of Shen Dao, Shen Buhai, and Shang Yang respectively by analyzing overlooked sources such as fragments of their work. My examination shows that the conventional view has no solid textual basis. Shen Dao stresses the idea of fa rather than shi; Shen Buhai discusses fa instead of shu. In addition, I analyze Shang Yang's theory of fa from the perspective of the relationship between law and utilitarianism, in which agriculture and war are the main tools to accelerate the interests of a state. In other words, fa is the most critical issue in the view of these three thinkers; it means a standard of rewards and punishments, which thus can be rendered as "laws." The second part of this dissertation discusses Han Feizi's own thought and interprets him from a different perspective, not as a synthesizer of the Fajia group. His main concern is how a ruler controls powerful ministers and strengthens his authority by means of fa along with li (ritual propriety). In the process, the term fa in Han Feizi's work is used in two connotations: "laws" and "administrative regulations." That is, Han Feizi adopts the term fa in the same way as his predecessors on the one hand, but expands it into a wide-ranging concept of sociopolitical regulation on the other. Han Feizi shares a concern with his predecessors, which is the establishment of a ruler-centered government by means of fa, but exposes himself to vibrant intellectual environments of the Warring States period.
机译:本文考察了中国战国时期的四个思想家的普遍观点:沈道,商阳,沉步海和韩非子。它们已被分类为发家。具体说来,韩非子因其三大宗旨,即商s的法(成文法治人民),沈部海的书法(操纵大臣的技术)和申道的史诗(三大法则)而被公认为其前任的综合者。权力或权威)。本文的上半部分与韩非子的三个先驱者进行了探讨,目的是通过分析其作品片段等被忽视的资料来探究石,书和发是否分别是沉道,沉步海和尚阳的主要信条。 。我的检查表明,传统观点没有坚实的文字基础。申道强调“发”而不是“发”。沉步海讨论发而不是书。另外,我从法律与功利主义的关系的角度分析了商Yang的法论,其中农业与战争是促进国家利益的主要工具。换句话说,在这三个思想家看来,fa是最关键的问题。它意味着奖励和惩罚的标准,因此可以被称为“法律”。本文的第二部分讨论了韩非子的思想,并以不同的角度对其进行了解释,而不是作为法家集团的综合者。他主要关心的是统治者如何通过fa和li(礼仪礼仪)来控制强大的部长并增强其权威。在此过程中,韩非子作品中的“发”一词有两个含义:“法律”和“行政法规”。也就是说,韩非子一方面以与他的前任相同的方式采用“ fa”一词,另一方面又将其扩展为广泛的社会政治调控概念。韩非子与他的前任们一样担心,这是通过fa建立以统治者为中心的政府,但他却暴露于战国时代充满活力的知识环境中。

著录项

  • 作者

    Yang, Soon-Ja.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pennsylvania.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pennsylvania.;
  • 学科 History Asia Australia and Oceania.;Political Science General.;Law.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 209 p.
  • 总页数 209
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:37:14
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号