首页> 外文学位 >Critical Exploration of Community Engagement and Accountability in Humanitarian Aid: Redefining Working Relationships in the Field.
【24h】

Critical Exploration of Community Engagement and Accountability in Humanitarian Aid: Redefining Working Relationships in the Field.

机译:对人道主义援助中社区参与和问责制的批判性探索:重新定义该领域的工作关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Drawing upon the merit and strengths of existing humanitarian aid principles, standards, and field practices but acknowledging the shortcomings of current working modalities, my research presents an alternative framework for aid organizations to utilize in the field when working to meet the needs of Members of the Affected Community (MOAC). This study addresses the need for enhanced accountability of humanitarian aid organizations and engagement of MOAC during international disaster relief and recovery efforts. Through the lenses of community psychology theory my research integrates published and grey literature on disaster response, personal insights as a humanitarian aid worker, and the views and perspectives of six humanitarian aid workers, attained via semi-structured interviews and subsequent two phase Delphi review process, to collaboratively develop a Humanitarian Response Linking System Model. The Humanitarian Response Linking System Model and related conceptual framework generates new perspectives on the complex interrelationship between community engagement, social accountability and financial accountability and redefines current power dynamics and work relationships in the field. Findings indicate that when aid organizations are more socially accountable, through forging collaborative working relationships with MOAC' s, it reduces the likelihood of error and community harm while promoting cost-effective, efficient and sustainable interventions -- each of which are important aspects of financial accountability. Thus, it is postulated that the utilization of the Humanitarian Response Linking System Model, and the resultant active engagement of MOAC will support aid organizations in moving beyond the conventional charity approach to humanitarian aid response to an engaged, collaborative approach to working with and responsively meeting the needs and priorities of MOAC. Further, it is proposed that the utilization of the Humanitarian Response Linking System Model will enhance the financial accountability of aid organizations to their donors as a direct consequence of aid organizations being more socially accountable to MOAC.;Keywords: Members of affected communities, humanitarian aid, community engagement, financial accountability, social accountability, model.
机译:利用现有人道主义援助原则,标准和实地做法的优点和优势,但认识到当前工作方式的缺点,我的研究提出了一个替代框架,供援助组织在努力满足当地会员的需求时在实地使用。受影响的社区(MOAC)。这项研究满足了在国际救灾和恢复工作中加强人道援助组织问责制和MOAC参与的需求。通过社区心理学理论的视角,我的研究整合了已发表的灰色文献以及关于灾难响应,作为人道主义援助人员的个人见解以及六位人道主义援助人员的观点和观点,这些文献是通过半结构化访谈和随后的两个阶段的德尔菲审查过程得出的,以合作开发人道主义响应链接系统模型。人道主义响应链接系统模型和相关概念框架对社区参与,社会责任和财务责任之间的复杂相互关系产生了新的观点,并重新定义了该领域当前的动力动态和工作关系。研究结果表明,当援助组织通过与MOAC建立协作性工作关系而对社会承担更多责任时,它将减少错误和社区损害的可能性,同时促进具有成本效益的,有效的和可持续的干预措施-每一项都是财务的重要方面问责制。因此,据推测,人道主义响应链接系统模型的使用以及MOAC的积极参与将支持援助组织超越传统的慈善方法,对人道主义援助做出响应,而转向参与,协作的方式来与之合作并积极地开会。 MOAC的需求和优先事项。此外,建议利用人道主义应急联系系统模型将增强援助组织对捐助者的财务责任,这是援助组织对MOAC承担更多社会责任的直接结果。关键词:受影响社区的成员,人道主义援助,社区参与,财务责任,社会责任,模型。

著录项

  • 作者

    Walters, William.;

  • 作者单位

    Wilfrid Laurier University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Wilfrid Laurier University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Psychology Social.;Sociology Public and Social Welfare.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 274 p.
  • 总页数 274
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号