首页> 外文学位 >Conditional Grants to Independent Foundations: The Emergence and Evolution of a Federal Policy Instrument in Canada.
【24h】

Conditional Grants to Independent Foundations: The Emergence and Evolution of a Federal Policy Instrument in Canada.

机译:对独立基金会的有条件赠款:加拿大联邦政策工具的出现和演变。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines a unique policy instrument, independent foundations, and the process of instrument choice, through case studies of the Canada Foundation for Innovation, Canada Health Infoway, and the Canadian Council on Learning. Using a modified version of Salamon's new governance framework, it analyzes the instrument choice decision, focusing on decision-makers' assessment of the instrument based on the characteristics of the instrument, as well as the influence of neoinstitutional factors and implementation challenges.;The research finds that the characteristics of independence and multi-year funding are particularly important to the emergence of the instrument due to the policy context of better than anticipated government finances and a desire to avoid future financial pressures. More surprisingly, limited consideration was given to the characteristic of automaticity while low visibility was seen as a positive rather than a negative attribute. Similarly, equity was not a particular concern in the instances where the instrument was implemented while the characteristics of the instrument contributed political feasibility and legitimacy to federal actions in areas of shared or provincial jurisdiction. More generally, the results of this dissertation highlight the importance of applying a neoinstitutional approach to the analysis of instrument choice decisions. Context and policy instruments are temporal. Rather than being static, instruments evolve and new instruments are created through innovations. Researchers must incorporate the potential for innovation and change as well as the specificity of context into their analysis rather than assuming a standard set of criteria and objectives.
机译:本文通过对加拿大创新基金会,加拿大健康信息之路和加拿大学习理事会的案例研究,探讨了独特的政策工具,独立的基金会以及选择工具的过程。使用萨拉曼(Salamon)新治理框架的修改版,它分析了工具选择决策,重点在于决策者根据工具的特征以及新制度因素的影响和实施挑战对工具的评估。研究发现,独立性和多年筹资的特征对于该工具的出现特别重要,因为其政策背景优于预期的政府财政,并且希望避免未来的财政压力。更加令人惊讶的是,对自动化的特性给予了有限的考虑,而低可见性被视为是积极的而非消极的。同样,在实施文书的情况下,公平并不是特别关注的问题,而文书的特征为共享或省管辖范围内的联邦行动提供了政治可行性和合法性。更概括地说,本文的结果突出了应用新制度方法分析工具选择决策的重要性。背景和政策手段是暂时的。仪器不是一成不变的,而是不断发展,通过创新创造了新的仪器。研究人员必须将创新和变革的潜力以及背景的特殊性纳入他们的分析中,而不是假设一套标准的标准和目标。

著录项

  • 作者

    Smiley, Helen.;

  • 作者单位

    Carleton University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Carleton University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Political Science Public Administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 361 p.
  • 总页数 361
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号