首页> 外文学位 >Family policies or labor markets? Women's employment inequality in 14 welfare states from 1960 to 2008.
【24h】

Family policies or labor markets? Women's employment inequality in 14 welfare states from 1960 to 2008.

机译:家庭政策还是劳动力市场? 1960年至2008年,美国有14个福利州的妇女就业不平等。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Women's labor force participation has increased dramatically across all advanced capitalist democracies over the last 50 years. However, women continue to face significant employment inequality in hours of employment, pay, and occupational gender segregation. These changes in women's employment outcomes have captured the attention of welfare state researchers and policymakers and have radically altered our understanding of the welfare state.;In this dissertation, I empirically assess how both welfare state policies and changes in the labor market influence women's employment outcomes across 14 welfare states from 1960 to 2008. The countries in this analysis are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, (West) Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. In this research, I focus primarily on family policies, a subset of state social policies that mediate the relationship between the market and family, and allow men and women to engage in care-taking responsibilities without losing their labor market position and rewards. The family policies I consider include parental leaves, publicly funded childcare, and family allowances, support benefits, and tax credits.;These policies are intriguing because there is evidence that much of the gap between men's and women's employment outcomes is caused by motherhood. Family policies are targeted specifically at mothers and families with children, and so should, theoretically, reduce the inequality between men's and women's employment outcomes. However, there is relatively little research into the role that family polices play in employment inequality at the aggregate level, especially in hours of work, the wage gap, or occupational gender segregation. This dissertation fills in that research gap by investigating the impact of family policies on women's labor force participation rates, women's rate of and share of part-time work and involuntary part-time work, the male/female wage gap, and occupational gender segregation, while accounting for other welfare state policies and activities and labor market factors that have been linked to women's employment outcomes.;In my analysis, I find that parental leaves increase labor force participation rates among young women and reduce the male-female wage gap. Publicly funded childcare increases labor force participation rates among young women, decreases women's concentration in part-time employment and in involuntary part-time employment, and reduces the male-female wage gap. Importantly, neither parental leaves nor childcare policies appear to be strongly related to occupational gender segregation. On the other hand, family allowances and support benefits decrease labor force participation rates for women ages 25-34 and increase occupational gender segregation.;My analysis provides evidence that generous maternity and parental leaves and high levels of publicly funded childcare work to reduce employment inequality between men and women by reducing inequalities in hours of work and reducing the male-female pay gap. The finding for the pay gap is particularly exciting because recent research has found that much of the pay gap across countries has been shown to be due to motherhood. I conclude with implications and directions for future research.
机译:在过去的50年中,所有先进的资本主义民主国家中,女性劳动力的参与都大大增加了。但是,妇女在就业,工资和职业性别隔离方面仍然面临严重的就业不平等。妇女就业结果的这些变化引起了福利国家研究人员和政策制定者的注意,并从根本上改变了我们对福利国家的认识。本文通过实证评估福利国家政策和劳动力市场的变化如何影响妇女的就业结果。从1960年到2008年的14个福利国家中。该分析的国家是奥地利,比利时,加拿大,丹麦,芬兰,法国,(西)德国,爱尔兰,意大利,荷兰,挪威,瑞典,英国和美国状态。在这项研究中,我主要关注家庭政策,这是调解市场与家庭之间关系的州社会政策的一个子集,并允许男人和女人承担照料职责,而又不会失去其劳动力市场地位和报酬。我考虑的家庭政策包括育儿假,公共资助的儿童保育,家庭津贴,抚养津贴和税收抵免。这些政策之所以令人着迷,是因为有证据表明男女就业结果之间的很大差距是由孕产造成的。家庭政策专门针对母亲和有孩子的家庭,因此从理论上讲,应减少男女就业成果之间的不平等。但是,关于家庭警察在总体水平上在就业不平等中所起的作用的研究相对较少,特别是在工作时间,工资差距或职业性别隔离方面。本论文通过调查家庭政策对女性劳动力参与率,女性兼职和非全日制工作的比例和比例,男女工资差距以及职业性别隔离的影响,填补了研究空白。在分析与妇女就业结果相关的其他福利国家政策和活动以及劳动力市场因素时;;在我的分析中,我发现育儿假增加了年轻妇女的劳动力参与率,并缩小了男女工资差距。公共资助的托儿服务提高了年轻妇女的劳动力参与率,降低了妇女在兼职和非自愿兼职中的集中度,并缩小了男女工资差距。重要的是,父母假和育儿政策似乎都与职业性别隔离没有密切关系。另一方面,家庭津贴和抚恤金降低了25-34岁妇女的劳动力参与率,并增加了职业性别隔离。;我的分析提供了证据,证明大量的产假和育儿假以及公共资助的高水平托儿工作可减少就业不平等通过减少工作时间的不平等和缩小男女薪酬差距来实现男女之间的平衡。工资差距的发现尤其令人兴奋,因为最近的研究发现,国家之间的大部分工资差距已证明是由于母亲。最后,我总结了未来研究的意义和方向。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tranby, Eric.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Minnesota.;

  • 授予单位 University of Minnesota.;
  • 学科 Demography.;Individual family studies.;Womens studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 352 p.
  • 总页数 352
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:37:11

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号