首页> 外文学位 >Restoring the 'shining waters:' Milltown, Montana and the history of Superfund implementation.
【24h】

Restoring the 'shining waters:' Milltown, Montana and the history of Superfund implementation.

机译:恢复“光辉的水域”:蒙大拿州的米尔敦和超级基金的实施历史。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation is a case study of a dam removal and river restoration within the nation's largest Superfund site. In 1981, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency included Milltown Reservoir on its first list of Superfund sites. Superfund law capped two decades of the federal government's most aggressive environmental legislation. While tracking the national story of Superfund law, my story provides a local view of how individuals, organizations, and agencies shaped the Superfund process. After the EPA designated Milltown a national Superfund site, the environment itself, persistent work within the channels of public policy, and federally-mediated compromise helped restore some shine to Milltown's waters.;Milltown is representational, rather than unique. Human health concerns, which were the primary purpose of Superfund, garnered Milltown designation. Arsenic contaminated the groundwater in a residential community. Groundwater contamination has been the most consistent and worrisome risk throughout the history of designating Superfund sites, while arsenic tops the list of contaminants reported at those sites. Nearly a century of upstream mining caused Milltown's problem. Mining sites cost more and occur more frequently than any other Superfund cleanups. Two major corporations were responsible for funding cleanup at Milltown, whereas nearly half of all Superfund sites have two to ten responsible parties. Thus, Milltown is exceptionally representative of Superfund's history.;Using extensive archival research, government documents, oral histories, newspaper accounts and personal observation, I have written a dissertation that explores how Milltown provoked major changes in Superfund implementation and late-20th century environmentalism. The final remedy at Milltown removed an average-sized dam and restored a section of the Clark Fork River. The process increased the importance of public input in Superfund and its emphasis on restoring environments. That shift coincided with a turn toward repairing degraded landscapes by both grassroots and national environmental groups. Milltown helped foster the growth of a corporate, restoration industry. And, it helped define restoration, while pushing restorative efforts beyond the confines of its Superfund boundaries.
机译:本文以美国最大的超级基金所在地的大坝拆除和河流修复为例。 1981年,美国环境保护局将密尔敦水库列入其第一批超级基金网站。超级基金法限制了联邦政府两十年来最积极的环境立法。在跟踪全国有关超级基金法律的故事时,我的故事提供了有关个人,组织和机构如何塑造超级基金流程的本地视图。在EPA将米尔敦指定为国家超级基金所在地之后,环境本身,在公共政策渠道内的持续工作以及联邦政府调解的妥协有助于使米尔敦的水域恢复光彩。米尔敦具有代表性,而不是独特。作为超级基金的主要目的,人类健康问题获得了米尔敦的称号。砷污染了一个居民社区的地下水。在指定超级基金地点的整个历史中,地下水污染一直是最一致和最令人担忧的风险,而砷是这些地点报告的污染物清单中的头等大事。近一个世纪的上游采矿业引发了米尔敦的问题。与任何其他Superfund清理相比,采矿站点的成本更高且发生频率更高。米尔敦(Milltown)有两家主要的公司负责清理资金,而所有超级基金网站中近一半都有2至10个责任方。因此,米尔敦是超级基金历史的杰出代表。通过广泛的档案研究,政府文件,口述历史,报纸报道和个人观察,我写了一篇论文,探讨了米尔敦如何引起了超级基金实施和20世纪末环境保护的重大变化。米尔敦(Milltown)的最终补救措施是拆除平均大小的水坝,并修复了克拉克福克河(Clark Fork River)的一部分。该过程增加了超级基金会中公众投入的重要性,并强调了恢复环境的重要性。这一转变与基层和国家环境团体都在修复退化的景观相吻合。 Milltown帮助促进了企业修复行业的发展。而且,它有助于定义恢复,同时将恢复工作推到其超级基金范围之外。

著录项

  • 作者

    Brooks, David James.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Montana.;

  • 授予单位 University of Montana.;
  • 学科 American history.;Environmental studies.;Public policy.;Political science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 329 p.
  • 总页数 329
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:42:42

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号