首页> 外文学位 >Epistemologies, relationships, values, and practices: Reconfiguring writing assessment through feminist qualitative methodologies.
【24h】

Epistemologies, relationships, values, and practices: Reconfiguring writing assessment through feminist qualitative methodologies.

机译:认识论,关系,价值观和实践:通过女性主义定性方法重新配置写作评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The field of composition studies has benefitted from applications of feminist, materialist, postcolonial and similar critical theories to the teaching and study of written texts. In addition, critical theories continue to make a significant impact on the teaching and study of writing and other co-fields of inquiry such as writing center and writing program administration scholarship. Despite these advancements and explorations of how social constructionist theories of learning impact the teaching of composition, writing assessment scholarship lags behind. This project engages this issue by heeding Brian Huot's recommendation in (Re)Articulating Writing Assessment to treat assessment as a form of research that helps teachers and writing program administrators to begin "asking and answering questions about students' writing and the programs designed to teach students to write" (148). In my dissertation project I argue that scholarship produced in the field of feminist qualitative research (FQR) can help us better engage assessment as research and continue the field of composition studies' work in applying critical theory to the teaching and study of writing. I demonstrate how FQR notions such as collaboration, negotiation, empowerment, and reflection can impact writing assessment scholarship. I also provide examples of how such scholarship can impact assessment practices in college level writing courses and in college writing programs. In writing classrooms, writing assessment practices informed by FQR scholarship can help educators better understand how context impacts their work and can help students develop their own assessment abilities and learn to negotiate the writing values of multiple audiences. To explore how FQR might impact writing program administration, I analyze the work of assessment scholar Bob Broad and identify places of similarity and difference between his work and a reconfiguration of writing assessment informed by feminist qualitative research methodologies.
机译:作文研究领域得益于女权主义,唯物主义,后殖民主义和类似的批判理论在书面文本的教学和研究中的应用。此外,批判理论继续对写作和其他研究领域的写作和学习产生重大影响,例如写作中心和写作程序管理奖学金。尽管在社会建构主义学习理论如何影响作文教学方面取得了这些进步和探索,写作评估奖学金仍然落后。该项目通过注意布莱恩·霍特(Brian Huot)在(重新)写作写作评估中的建议来解决此问题,该评估将研究视为一种研究形式,可帮助教师和写作计划管理员开始“提出和回答有关学生写作和旨在教给学生的计划的问题写“(148)。在我的论文项目中,我认为在女性主义定性研究(FQR)领域产生的奖学金可以帮助我们更好地参与评估研究,并继续进行写作研究在将批判理论应用于写作的教学和研究方面的工作。我演示了FQR概念(例如协作,谈判,授权和反思)如何影响写作评估奖学金。我还提供了有关此类奖学金如何影响大学水平写作课程和大学写作程序中评估实践的示例。在写作教室中,由FQR奖学金提供的写作评估实践可以帮助教育工作者更好地了解背景如何影响他们的工作,并可以帮助学生发展自己的评估能力,并学会协商多个听众的写作价值。为了探究FQR如何影响写作程序管理,我分析了评估学者Bob Broad的工作,并确定了他的工作与女权主义定性研究方法对写作评估的重新配置之间的异同。

著录项

  • 作者

    Scott, Marc A.;

  • 作者单位

    New Mexico State University.;

  • 授予单位 New Mexico State University.;
  • 学科 Language Rhetoric and Composition.;Education Tests and Measurements.;Education Language and Literature.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 273 p.
  • 总页数 273
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:42:39

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号