首页> 外文学位 >Analyzing traditional-based teaching methods versus technology-based teaching methods in collegiate aviation classrooms.
【24h】

Analyzing traditional-based teaching methods versus technology-based teaching methods in collegiate aviation classrooms.

机译:在大学航空教室中分析基于传统的教学方法与基于技术的教学方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study is a comparative analysis of traditional-based teaching methods versus technology-based teaching methods in collegiate aviation classrooms. Education is in a transformational period. Technology use in the classroom is a major part of this transformation. However, this change in pedagogy is not occurring as rapid as one might believe. Out of ten undergraduate professors in the United States teaching in higher education, fewer than two seriously use computers and other technologies in their classrooms. Of the ten, four to five professors never use the machines at all. The same is true in collegiate aviation classrooms; technology-based teaching methods and technology use in the classroom for instructional purposes are in the early stages.; This study was conducted at a Florida university. The population was aviation students enrolled in a Florida university Aeronautics Program. The sample consisted students enrolled in the technology-based teaching methods course in the spring of 2004. The same course was taught once with traditional-based teaching methods in the spring of 2003. Ex-post facto data was used from the spring 2003 course.; The main purpose of the study was to understand how technology-based teaching methods affect student's overall final grade performance in an aviation course, at a Florida university. In the study, the final grade averages of the traditional-based teaching methods course were analyzed between the technology-based teaching methods course. In the spring 2004 (technology-based) the students' perceptions of technology-based teaching methods were correlated with their final grades, and a correlation analysis was run between the students' final grade and their total flight time experience as measured in flight hours. The results of the statistical tests did not yield a statistic at the .05 alpha level or higher. However, perception survey question #5 did yield a .042 alpha level. The researcher concludes that technology-based teaching methods may not always improve a students' performance in the class but, it will not hurt a students' performance. The researcher also concludes that if a student perceives technology useful in learning school subjects, then that student will perform better in the specific aviation class than another student who does not believe technology is useful in learning school subjects. However, students' perceptions of technology need to be investigated further. The researcher is compelled to recommend that a qualitative and quantitative research study should be conducted to better understand the coursework performance of aviation students' before and after they become C.F.I.s in a collegiate aeronautics program.
机译:这项研究是对大学航空教室中传统教学方法与技术教学方法的比较分析。教育正处于转型期。课堂中的技术使用是这一转变的主要部分。但是,这种教学方法的变化没有人们想象的那么快。在美国教授高等教育的十位本科教授中,只有不到两位认真地在教室中使用计算机和其他技术。在十位教授中,有四到五位教授根本没有使用过这些机器。在大学航空教室也是如此。基于技术的教学方法和课堂教学中的技术使用尚处于早期阶段。这项研究是在佛罗里达大学进行的。人口是佛罗里达大学航空计划的航空学生。样本包括2004年春季参加基于技术的教学方法课程的学生。2003年春季,该课程使用传统的基于教学方法的课程进行过一次授课。事后数据来自2003年春季课程。 ;这项研究的主要目的是了解佛罗里达大学在航空课程中基于技术的教学方法如何影响学生的整体最终成绩。在研究中,对基于技术的教学方法课程之间的传统基于教学方法课程的最终平均成绩进行了分析。在2004年春季(基于技术)中,学生对基于技术的教学方法的理解与他们的最终成绩相关,并且对学生的最终成绩和他们在飞行时间中测得的总飞行时间之间进行了相关分析。统计测试的结果在.05 alpha或更高水平上未产生统计数据。但是,感知调查问题5的确产生了0.042的alpha水平。研究人员得出结论,基于技术的教学方法可能并不总是能提高学生在课堂上的表现,但不会损害学生的表现。研究人员还得出结论,如果一个学生认为技术对学习学校科目有用,那么该学生在特定的航空课上的表现将比另一个不认为技术对学习学校科目有用的学生更好。但是,学生对技术的看法需要进一步调查。研究人员被迫建议进行定性和定量研究,以更好地了解航空学生在大学航空项目中成为C.F.I.之前和之后的课程表现。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Lynn University.;

  • 授予单位 Lynn University.;
  • 学科 Education Curriculum and Instruction.; Education Technology.; Education Vocational.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 102 p.
  • 总页数 102
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;职业技术教育;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:42:37

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号