首页> 外文学位 >An evaluation of leisure agriculture policy in Taiwan utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) (China).
【24h】

An evaluation of leisure agriculture policy in Taiwan utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) (China).

机译:利用层次分析法(AHP)对台湾休闲农业政策进行评估(中国)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study is to identify and measure the effectiveness of the Taiwanese Council of Agriculture's overall success in promoting "leisure agriculture" development. An 18-member expert panel, consisting of farm owners, scholars, and policy enforcers, was interviewed to identify the potential indicators for the performance evaluation. A panel of three researchers then reviewed these indicators and developed the evaluation framework. Thirty-three performance indicators for the performance evaluation were embedded within three dimensions: economy, enjoyment, and ecology. Using a mailed survey, 509 stakeholders (including farm owners, scholars, and policy enforcers) were asked how satisfied they were with each of these 33 performance indicators. Using confirmatory factor analysis, data were analyzed to confirm the content validity of these three dimensions as well as an evaluation framework developed for this study. After developing the evaluation framework, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was utilized to assign weights to selected evaluation indicators using the judgments of the 18-member expert panel. The AHP provided more useful quantitative information about group preferences, satisfaction levels, and an overall performance score then the importance-performance analysis did.; The results of this research show that the stakeholders deem these three dimensions of the evaluation framework as equally important. This suggests that future development should focus evenly on the economy, enjoyment, and ecology. On a scale of 0 (low) to 10 (high) these stakeholders gave an overall policy evaluation score of 5.9. The scholars assigned a slightly higher average rating (6.1) to the policy than did the farmers (5.8) and the policy enforcers (5.9). Thus, the policy was judged to be only marginally successful by all groups of stakeholders. From the micro view, the ratings of most economic indicators were below the average, indicating the economic performance needs to be enhanced.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定和衡量台湾农业委员会在促进“休闲农业”发展方面取得的总体成功。由农场所有者,学者和政策执行者组成的由18人组成的专家小组进行了采访,以确定绩效评估的潜在指标。然后由三名研究人员组成的小组审查了这些指标并制定了评估框架。绩效评估的33个绩效指标被嵌入三个维度:经济,享受和生态。通过邮寄调查,询问了509个利益相关者(包括农场所有者,学者和政策执行者)对这33个绩效指标中的每一个的满意程度。使用验证性因素分析,对数据进行分析以确认这三个维度的内容有效性以及为此研究开发的评估框架。在建立评估框架之后,利用18位专家小组的判断,运用层次分析法(AHP)为选定的评估指标分配权重。层次分析法提供了有关群体偏好,满意度和整体绩效得分的更有用的定量信息,而重要性绩效分析则没有。这项研究的结果表明,利益相关者认为评估框架的这三个方面同样重要。这表明未来的发展应该平均地集中在经济,娱乐和生态上。这些利益相关者在0(低)到10(高)的范围内给出了5.9的总体政策评估得分。与农民(5.8)和政策执行者(5.9)相比,学者对政策的平均评分(6.1)略高。因此,所有利益相关者团体都认为该政策仅取得了一定的成功。从微观上看,大多数经济指标的评级都低于平均水平,表明经济表现有待提高。

著录项

  • 作者

    Yen, Hung-Hsu.;

  • 作者单位

    Michigan State University.;

  • 授予单位 Michigan State University.;
  • 学科 Recreation.; Political Science General.; Urban and Regional Planning.; Economics Agricultural.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 170 p.
  • 总页数 170
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 群众文化事业;政治理论;区域规划、城乡规划;农业经济;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:42:39

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号