首页> 外文学位 >Faculty perceptions of the National Undergraduate Teaching and Learning Evaluation at regular higher education institutions from 2003 to 2008 in China.
【24h】

Faculty perceptions of the National Undergraduate Teaching and Learning Evaluation at regular higher education institutions from 2003 to 2008 in China.

机译:2003年至2008年,中国普通高等教育机构对国家本科教学评估的教师看法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study explored how faculty members at regular higher education institutions in China perceived the National Undergraduate Teaching and Learning Evaluation (NUTLE). Specifically, this study examined how the NUTLE influenced faculty teaching and research and how the NUTLE influenced student learning outcomes. Primarily descriptive and exploratory, the quantitative study utilized a web-based bilingual survey that was sent to 595 faculty members affiliated with 15 institutions in Northwest China. The survey achieved a response rate of 46.9%. Descriptive statistics and cross tabulation analyses were used to better understand the relation between demographic characteristics and faculty perceptions.;Findings indicated that the majority of the faculty members were informed of the NUTLE at formal meetings and were involved in preparing for the NUTLE. After the NUTLE, most faculty members reported that their universities required them to do more research than before the NUTLE. Most of them believed the main purpose of the NUTLE was to insure higher education quality, with only 7.4% believing the main purpose was to enhance student learning. While disagreeing that their institutions made every effort to improve undergraduate student learning outcomes, regardless of institution types, year of evaluation, and the NUTLE grade received, most of the faculty members' overall perception of the NUTLE was positive.;The findings were analyzed and interpreted through Hofstede's framework of cultural dimensions. Implications for policy and practice were addressed, including reducing government administration and intervention in the implementation process of higher education evaluation, empowering colleges and universities by providing them more training opportunities to understand higher education evaluation both locally and globally, and setting up offices of Institutional Research to collect data for proactive self-evaluation. Recommendations were also provided for future research.
机译:这项研究探讨了中国普通高校教师如何看待国家本科教学评估。具体而言,本研究考察了NUTLE如何影响教师的教学和研究以及NUTLE如何影响学生的学习成果。定量研究主要是描述性和探索性的,它使用基于网络的双语调查,该调查已发送给西北地区15个机构的595名教职员工。该调查的回应率为46.9%。描述性统计和交叉制表分析用于更好地了解人口统计学特征与教职员工知觉之间的关系。研究结果表明,大多数教职员工在正式会议上都了解了NUTLE,并参与了NUTLE的准备工作。 NUTLE之后,大多数教师报告说,与NUTLE之前相比,他们的大学要求他们做更多的研究。他们中的大多数人认为NUTLE的主要目的是确保高等教育质量,只有7.4%的人认为NUTLE的主要目的是增强学生的学习。尽管不同院校类型,评估年份和获得NUTLE的成绩各不相同,但他们的机构不惜一切努力来改善本科生的学习成果,但大多数教职员工对NUTLE的总体看法是肯定的;通过霍夫斯泰德的文化维度框架进行解释。解决了对政策和实践的影响,包括减少政府行政管理和对高等教育评估实施过程的干预;通过为大学和大学提供更多的培训机会,以在本地和全球范围内理解高等教育评估,增强大学的能力;以及设立机构研究办公室收集数据以进行主动的自我评估。还提供了建议,以供将来研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    An, Jumei.;

  • 作者单位

    Bowling Green State University.;

  • 授予单位 Bowling Green State University.;
  • 学科 Education Evaluation.;Education Higher.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 197 p.
  • 总页数 197
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:42:28

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号