首页> 外文学位 >An Analysis of Supreme Court Rulings and Public Opinion on Euthanasia.
【24h】

An Analysis of Supreme Court Rulings and Public Opinion on Euthanasia.

机译:最高法院关于安乐死的裁决和舆论分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Euthanasia has been around for centuries, but it became one of the most controversial subjects in the last two decades. Euthanasia is defined as mercy killings. There are different types of euthanasia such as: active, passive, voluntary, involuntary euthanasia, assisted suicide, and physician-assisted suicide. There are only two kinds of euthanasia that are legal: (1) passive euthanasia allows a patient to die by natural causes, and (2) physician-assisted suicide is legal in three states---Oregon, Washington, and Montana.;There are some factors that have caused euthanasia to become a subject of major debate in recent times. One of the first major factors is fundamental rights. Americans have fundamental rights---the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The second major factor is secularization, which leads to the decline of religious authority. The third major factor is the landmark cases that have brought euthanasia to the center of debate. The fourth major reason is Dr. Jack Kevorkian. He was an activist for physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. Dr. Kevorkian put this subject nationwide and made Americans stand up and take notice.;Public opinion has changed since the 1970's, and the trend seems to keep on growing. Even though public opinion has grown over the years, euthanasia will not be easy to get legalized, mainly because of its possible abuse. Physician-assisted suicide will continue to be argued in legislation, as long as, Americans feel that having the right to die is "dying with dignity."
机译:安乐死已经存在了几个世纪,但在过去的二十年中,它已成为最具争议的主题之一。安乐死被定义为仁慈杀戮。安乐死有不同类型,例如:主动,被动,自愿,非自愿安乐死,辅助自杀和医生协助下的自杀。合法的安乐死只有两种:(1)被动安乐死允许患者因自然原因死亡,(2)在俄勒冈州,华盛顿州和蒙大拿州这三个州,医生协助自杀是合法的。造成安乐死成为近来主要辩论话题的一些因素。第一个主要因素是基本权利。美国人拥有基本权利-生命,自由和追求幸福的权利。第二个主要因素是世俗化,导致宗教权威的下降。第三个主要因素是使安乐死成为辩论中心的里程碑式事件。第四个主要原因是Jack Kevorkian博士。他是医师协助的自杀和安乐死的积极分子。 Kevorkian博士将这个问题放到全国各地,使美国人站起来并引起注意。自1970年代以来,舆论已经发生了变化,而且趋势似乎还在继续增长。尽管多年来公众舆论已经增长,但安乐死并不容易合法化,主要是因为它可能被滥用。只要美国人认为拥有死亡权就是“有尊严地死亡”,医生将继续在立法中争论自杀。

著录项

  • 作者

    Boston, Trencia A.;

  • 作者单位

    Southern University and Agricultural and Mechanical College.;

  • 授予单位 Southern University and Agricultural and Mechanical College.;
  • 学科 Ethics.;Health Sciences Medical Ethics.;Political Science General.;Law.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 80 p.
  • 总页数 80
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号