首页> 外文学位 >Law Enforcement Performance Auditing: A Proactive New Police Accountability Management Tool.
【24h】

Law Enforcement Performance Auditing: A Proactive New Police Accountability Management Tool.

机译:执法绩效审计:一种主动的新警察问责管理工具。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose. This study examined the effectiveness of law enforcement performance auditing (LEPA) as a new police accountability tool.;Theoretical Framework. The theoretical framework regarding LEPA as it relates to public administration was based on democratic accountability and bureaucratic theory. It examined organization theory encompassing theories of public management, which included traditional public management theory. Additionally, it also explored accountability and performance theories, and organizational culture theory.;Methodology. This exploratory research study collected empirical data from audit practitioners in the law enforcement field. The primary method of obtaining data for analysis was an electronic survey. Interviews were also conducted. The researcher developed the Audit/Inspection Reliability and Disclosure Typology, which measured the level of transparency within an organization and auditor independence within an audit/inspection entity. The typology was used to determine an organization's placement in 1 of 4 categories: (a) open, (b) professional, (c) symbolic, or (d) closed.;Findings. Data showed that the LEPA concept was very effective. Administrative personnel were aware of all the new police accountability tools and applied them. Also, a large percentage of the audit entities were following auditing standards. Audit entities were reporting their findings without interference, but some participants commented that staff or administrators had approached them to alter audit findings. A concern was that many organizations were not holding their administrators accountable for implementing audit findings. Another was that approximately one third of the organizations did not report their audit findings to the public. Finally, an analysis of the Audit/Inspection Reliability and Disclosure Typology revealed that over 80% of the organizations were in the open category, and the remaining organizations were split between the professional and symbolic categories. There were no organizations in the closed category.;Conclusions and Recommendations. LEPA is a viable and effective tool for public safety/law enforcement administrators. Recommendations were made for administrator and management accountability, civilian oversight, relationships with the community, consent decrees, LEPA audit entity organizational structure, and organizational culture. The International Association of Chiefs of Police should endorse the LEPA concept, and additional academic research should be conducted. This includes future development of the Audit/Inspection Reliability and Disclosure Typology.
机译:目的。这项研究检查了执法绩效审核(LEPA)作为新的警察问责工具的有效性。理论框架。 LEPA与公共行政有关的理论框架是基于民主责任制和官僚理论。它研究了包含公共管理理论的组织理论,其中包括传统的公共管理理论。此外,它还探讨了问责制和绩效理论以及组织文化理论。这项探索性研究旨在从执法领域的审计从业人员那里收集经验数据。获取数据进行分析的主要方法是电子调查。还进行了访谈。研究人员开发了“审计/检查可靠性和披露类型”,该方法测量了组织内部的透明度和审计/检查实体内部的审计师独立性。该类型用于确定组织在以下4个类别中的1个类别中的位置:(a)开放,(b)专业,(c)象征性或(d)封闭。)。数据表明,LEPA概念非常有效。行政人员知道所有新的警察问责工具并加以应用。而且,很大一部分审计实体都遵循审计标准。审计实体在不加干扰地报告其调查结果的情况下,但一些参与者评论说,工作人员或管理人员已与他们联系以更改审计结果。令人担忧的是,许多组织没有要求其管理员对实施审计结果负责。另一个是,大约有三分之一的组织没有向公众报告其审计结果。最后,对审计/检查可靠性和披露类型学的分析表明,超过80%的组织属于公开类别,其余组织则分为专业类别和象征性类别。封闭类别中没有组织。结论和建议。对于公共安全/执法管理人员而言,LEPA是一种可行且有效的工具。针对管理者和管理人员的责任,平民监督,与社区的关系,同意令,LEPA审核实体的组织结构和组织文化提出了建议。国际警察局长协会应认可LEPA的概念,并应进行更多的学术研究。这包括审核/检查可靠性和披露类型的未来发展。

著录项

  • 作者

    Figueroa, Christopher.;

  • 作者单位

    University of La Verne.;

  • 授予单位 University of La Verne.;
  • 学科 Political Science Public Administration.;Sociology Public and Social Welfare.;Sociology Criminology and Penology.
  • 学位 D.P.A.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 288 p.
  • 总页数 288
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 动物医学(兽医学);
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号