首页> 外文学位 >Psychometric testing of the Multi-Modal Coping Inventory: A new measure of general coping styles.
【24h】

Psychometric testing of the Multi-Modal Coping Inventory: A new measure of general coping styles.

机译:多种应对方式库存的心理测验:一种通用应对方式的新方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The first chapter is a systematic literature review that used five major social science databases to exam nine general coping instruments most commonly used in the coping literature. These nine coping instruments were reviewed in terms of their initial development, psychometric qualities, and overall strengths and weaknesses.; The second chapter provides results of three studies that (a) test the content validity of the Multi-Modal Coping Inventory (MMCI), a hypothesized 36-item, 6-factor coping instrument that measures general coping styles, through two rounds of four international expert reviewers; (b) test the internal convergent and discriminant construct validity of the MMCI through the use of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses; and (c) test the internal consistency and four-to-six-week stability of the new measure. Exploratory factor analyses and confirmatory factor analyses only supported internal construct validity for a five-factor (Belief, Social, Imagination, Cognitive, and Physiology), 18-item model. Internal consistency ranged from moderately high (alpha = .86) to marginal for the Imagination dimension (alpha = .59). A four-to-six-week test-retest interval revealed evidence of adequate stability across all dimensions.; Chapter three presents results of a series of studies that (a) test external-reference construct validity of the MMCI through correlational analysis of the MMCI's dimensions and the constructs of well-being and depression; (b) test the criterion validity of the MMCI by correlating its dimensions with similar dimensions on the COPE Inventory (Carver, Scheier, & Weintraub, 1989); and (c) test known group differences for age and sex on the MMCI dimensions. Results of the series of studies provide moderate evidence for the construct validity of the Belief and Physiology dimensions, and strong evidence for the construct validity of the Cognitive, Imagination, and Social dimensions of the MMCI.
机译:第一章是系统的文献综述,它使用五个主要的社会科学数据库来检查应对文学中最常用的九种通用应对工具。对这九种应对手段的初步发展,心理测量质量以及总体优缺点进行了审查。第二章提供了三项研究的结果:(a)通过两轮四个国际测试来检验多模态应对量表(MMCI)的内容效度,MMCI是一种假设的36项,六要素应对量度的工具,用于测量一般应对方式。专家审稿人; (b)通过使用探索性和确认性因素分析来检验MMCI的内部收敛性和判别性结构的有效性; (c)测试新措施的内部一致性和四到六周的稳定性。探索性因素分析和确认性因素分析仅支持五项因素(信念,社会,想象力,认知和生理)的18项模型的内部结构效度。内部一致性的范围从中等高(alpha = .86)到边缘的想象范围(alpha = .59)。四到六周的测试-再测试间隔显示出在所有维度上都具有足够稳定性的证据。第三章介绍了一系列研究的结果。(a)通过对MMCI的维度以及幸福感和抑郁感的构造进行相关分析,测试MMCI的外部参照构造的有效性; (b)通过将MMCI的尺寸与COPE清单上的相似尺寸相关联来检验MMCI的标准有效性(Carver,Scheier,&Weintraub,1989); (c)在MMCI维度上测试年龄和性别的已知群体差异。这一系列研究的结果为信仰和生理维度的建构效度提供了适度的证据,为MMCI的认知,想象力和社会维度的建构效度提供了有力的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号