首页> 外文学位 >Health, safety & environmental measures and international economic law.
【24h】

Health, safety & environmental measures and international economic law.

机译:健康,安全和环境措施以及国际经济法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Owing to scientific insights and greater awareness of the deteriorating environment, since the 1970s governments have adopted a range of health, safety and environmental (HSE) measures at the national and international levels. While their purposes vary, HSE measures generally seek: the protection of the population from HSE risks; the internalization by economic operators of their negative externalities; and the transformation of consumption and production patterns. As a result, environmental law has emerged in comparative and international law.;HSE measures enter a policy space already occupied by international economic law. Generally, economic law seeks to enable successful economic ventures and development by removing obstacles to trade and securing protection to foreign investment. To these ends, it deploys dispute settlement mechanisms which may attract conflicts relating to HSE measures, especially where the costs of compliance with these measures significantly affect foreign investors or countries other than those benefiting from increased HSE protection.;International tribunals established under the World Trade Organization (WTO) or international investment agreements (IIAs) have scrutinized HSE measures. Adjudicating claims involving HSE measures confronts the challenge of affirming economic law disciplines while avoiding interpretations and results that defeat the objectives of the international regimes underlying HSE measures.;Under the paradigm of sustainable development, which seeks to reconcile economic development and environmental protection by integrating environmental issues in the development planning and decision-making process, systemic integration techniques of treaty interpretation avail to facilitate normative dialogue between economic, environmental, and human rights law. This dialogue is critical to threading coherence, synergy and mutual supportiveness among these regimes, so that they do not frustrate each other's goals.;In this light, this dissertation explores the issues and tensions involved in the adjudication of HSE measures by dispute settlement mechanisms established in international economic law, with a view to finding ways of building mutually supportive trade, investment, environmental and human rights regimes.
机译:自1970年代以来,由于科学见识和对环境恶化的更多认识,各国政府已在国家和国际两级采取了一系列健康,安全和环境(HSE)措施。尽管其目的各不相同,但HSE措施通常旨在:保护人们免受HSE风险;经济经营者将其负面外部性内部化;以及消费和生产方式的转变。结果,在比较法和国际法中都出现了环境法。HSE措施进入了国际经济法已经占据的政策空间。一般而言,经济法力图消除贸易障碍并确保对外国投资的保护,以实现成功的经济事业和发展。为此目的,它部署了争端解决机制,可能会引起与HSE措施有关的冲突,特别是在遵守这些措施的成本显着影响除受益于HSE保护的国家以外的外国投资者或国家的情况下;世界贸易组织下设立的国际法庭组织(WTO)或国际投资协议(IIA)已审查了HSE措施。裁定涉及HSE措施的主张面临着确认经济法学科的挑战,同时避免了会破坏构成HSE措施的国际制度目标的解释和结果。在可持续发展的范式下,其旨在通过整合环境来协调经济发展与环境保护发展规划和决策过程中的问题,条约解释的系统性整合技术可用于促进经济,环境和人权法之间的规范对话。这种对话对于在这些制度之间建立连贯性,协同增效和相互支持至关重要,因此它们不会破坏彼此的目标。因此,本文探讨了通过建立的争端解决机制来裁决HSE措施所涉及的问题和紧张关系。在国际经济法中,以寻求建立相互支持的贸易,投资,环境和人权制度的方式。

著录项

  • 作者

    Orellana, Marcos A.;

  • 作者单位

    The American University.;

  • 授予单位 The American University.;
  • 学科 Law.;Environmental Law.;Political Science General.;Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 S.J.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 321 p.
  • 总页数 321
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:37:09

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号