首页> 外文学位 >Status characteristics and judicial discretion.
【24h】

Status characteristics and judicial discretion.

机译:身份特征和司法自由裁量权。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This research examines the idea that status characteristics influence criminal justice decision making and case processing. This study is rooted in the status-characteristics/expectation states tradition in sociological social psychology. While quantitative studies at the macro level consistently suggest that status characteristics such as race and gender have an impact on criminal justice decision making, what is lacking is an understanding of how these factors operate at the micro level of the individual case. A promising alternative for understanding the impact of individual characteristics at the micro level is the status-characteristics/expectation states tradition in sociological social psychology.;Twelve Felony district court judges from the State of Texas were interviewed and asked to provide perspective, sentencing, and observations for three felony cases. The findings indicate that specific and diffuse characteristics do influence performance expectations and thereby case processing. The results show that specific structural characteristics such as financial and familial support as well as diffuse characteristics, chiefly age and education stimulate performance expectations among criminal justice decision makers. The likelihood of offender rehabilitation and the safety of the community factor heavily in performance expectations associated with status characteristics. Significant findings in the study include process level thinking on the part of judges, and the influence of judges` personal experience with victimization on sentencing decisions. Furthermore, the research suggests that judges appear to have treated legal variables in a manner similar to status characteristics. Findings point to the need for continued qualitative research on criminal justice decision making and the influence of status characteristics on case processing.
机译:这项研究考察了身份特征影响刑事司法决策和案件处理的观点。这项研究扎根于社会学社会心理学中的地位特征/期望状态传统。尽管宏观层面的定量研究始终表明,种族和性别等身份特征会影响刑事司法决策,但缺乏对这些因素在个案微观层面上的运作方式的理解。在微观层面上理解个体特征影响的一个有前途的替代方法是社会学社会心理学中的状态特征/期望状态传统。;采访了得克萨斯州的12名Felony地区法院法官,并要求他们提供观点,量刑和意见。对三个重罪案件的观察。研究结果表明,特定和分散的特征确实会影响绩效预期,从而影响案件处理。结果表明,特定的结构特征,例如财务和家庭支持以及分散的特征(主要是年龄和教育程度)激发了刑事司法决策者的绩效期望。罪犯康复的可能性和社区的安全在很大程度上取决于与身份特征相关的绩效期望。该研究的重要发现包括法官方面的过程层面思考,以及法官个人受害经历对量刑判决的影响。此外,研究表明,法官似乎以与地位特征相似的方式对待法律变量。调查结果表明,有必要继续对刑事司法决策及其地位特征对案件处理的影响进行定性研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lynton, Eddy.;

  • 作者单位

    Texas Woman's University.;

  • 授予单位 Texas Woman's University.;
  • 学科 Law.;Sociology Criminology and Penology.;Psychology Social.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 129 p.
  • 总页数 129
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号