首页> 外文学位 >On the subject of autobiography: Finding a self in the works of Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Sartre, and Derrida (Soren Kierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche, Jean-Paul Sartre, Jacques Derrida).
【24h】

On the subject of autobiography: Finding a self in the works of Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Sartre, and Derrida (Soren Kierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche, Jean-Paul Sartre, Jacques Derrida).

机译:关于自传:在基尔凯郭尔,尼采,萨特和德里达的作品中找到自己(索伦·基尔凯郭尔,弗里德里希·尼采,让·保罗·萨特,雅克·德里达)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation interrogates the notions of selfhood, agency, and subjectivity in the autobiographical works of Jean-Paul Sartre, Friedrich Nietzsche, Soren (Soren) Kierkegaard, and Jacques Derrida, all of which are significantly under-researched in the philosophical literature. I show, in each case, that the autobiographical works have a significant philosophical core that deserves drawing out, particularly with relevance to the knot of problems surrounding the quaestio mihi factus sum---the question, enigma, or mystery that I am. I situate each work within the context of the author's larger treatment of the same issues in the more "theoretical" works, and then proceed to show that the autobiographical works all present a slightly different or more advanced picture of things, which is in each case at least partially dependent upon the genre itself. In the case of Sartre, this amounts to a real balance between freedom and the force of circumstances in Les Mots (Words); for Nietzsche, the virtual effacement of all conscious activity in Ecce Homo. For Kierkegaard and Derrida, the primary difference is performative: they are doing something in their autobiographical texts that they are not elsewhere. Kierkegaard's On My Work as an Author is, as he says, a "deed" rather than a "work"; likewise, Derrida's Circonfession (Circumfession) is an attempt to enact an "event." I further establish that there is a veritatem facere, a "making," "doing," or "performing" of the truth, in each autobiographical text---in the form of an integration of our past into our current situation (Sartre), an affirming of our fate (Nietzsche), a witnessing before God (Kierkegaard), and a testifying to our responsibility to the Other (Derrida). I conclude by reflecting on some of the more significant successes, failures, and problems inherent in these autobiographical projects, in light of philosophical reflection on the genre.
机译:本论文对让·保罗·萨特(Jean-Paul Sartre),弗里德里希·尼采(Friedrich Nietzsche),索伦(Soren)Kierkegaard和雅克·德里达(Jacques Derrida)的自传著作中的自我,代理和主观性概念进行了质疑,所有这些著作在哲学文献中都受到了严重的研究。我表明,在每种情况下,自传作品都具有重要的哲学核心,值得借鉴,尤其是与我所关心的问题-我是一个问题,谜团或奥秘-有关。我将每件作品都放在作者对更多“理论”作品中的相同问题进行较大处理的背景下,然后继续证明自传作品都呈现出稍微不同或更高级的事物图景,在每种情况下至少部分取决于类型本身。就萨特而言,这等于在《自由》中的自由与处境力量之间的真正平衡。对于尼采来说,埃克塞霍莫所有有意识活动的虚拟面目。对于Kierkegaard和Derrida而言,主要的区别是表现力:他们在自传体书中所做的事情是其他地方没有的。正如他所说,基尔凯郭尔的《作者的创作论》是“行为”,而不是“作品”。同样,德里达的“告白”(Circumfession)也是试图制定“事件”的一种尝试。我进一步确定,在每本自传文本中,都有一种真实的面子,即“制造”,“做”或“表演”真相,形式是将过去融入我们的现状(萨特) ,对我们命运的肯定(尼采),在上帝面前的见证(基尔凯郭尔)以及对我们对他人的责任(德里达)的见证。最后,我根据体裁的哲学思考,反思了这些自传项目固有的一些更重要的成功,失败和问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    Whitmire, John Floyd, Jr.;

  • 作者单位

    Villanova University.;

  • 授予单位 Villanova University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.; Biography.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 361 p.
  • 总页数 361
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;传记;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:41:45

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号