首页> 外文学位 >'A cage went in search of a bird': Reading repetitions in the writings of Kafka and Kierkegaard (Franz Kafka, Austria, Soren Kierkegaard).
【24h】

'A cage went in search of a bird': Reading repetitions in the writings of Kafka and Kierkegaard (Franz Kafka, Austria, Soren Kierkegaard).

机译:“一个笼子里寻找一只鸟”:阅读卡夫卡和基尔凯郭尔著作中的重复作品(弗朗茨·卡夫卡,奥地利,索伦·基尔凯郭尔)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Reading repetitions in the writings of Soren Kierkegaard and Franz Kafka entails tracing the rhetorical patterns that organize their texts. Such rhetorical micro-reading clarifies the presuppositions of hermeneutic and thematic interpretations of these texts. As such, my reading aligns itself with Paul de Man's larger project of pursuing readings that discern the rhetorical patterns that organize the distribution and the movement of the key terms; in this vein, de Man contends that questions of valorization can be considered only after the rhetorical status of a text has been clarified. Rhetorical reading involves suspending the belief that literary language refers to anything but itself. This approach ultimately arrives at an examination of the "origin" of readability and its relation to texts, an examination that poses a threat to hermeneutic and thematic modes of interpretation, and therefore also a threat to the aspects in Kafka and Kierkegaard's texts that support such interpretation. My reading of repetitions investigates the extent to which Kierkegaard and Kafka's texts agree with and invite rhetorical reading.; Such reading requires examining the following elements: the texts' reliance on and undermining of metaphorical logic, an undermining taking place by the texts operating according to a logic of adjacency rather than transcendence and of materiality rather than figural meaning; how the texts base themselves on the divergences between what the text means and how it means; the texts' disturbance of their own readability and how they in inverted fashion question the origin of readability; how the texts discuss and employ irony only to have it overtake their texts; how the structure of revocation instantiates the passage from "regular" irony to the irony of irony; how this passage displays the shift from considering unreadability as a product of the text disrupting the way in which the text works to considering unreadability as the monstrous condition of readability; and finally the texts' glimpsing of the monstrosity of language, primarily in language functioning as a machine. I have named the examination of these questions reading repetition.
机译:阅读Soren Kierkegaard和Franz Kafka著作中的重复作品时,必须追溯组织其文字的修辞模式。这种修辞性的微读澄清了这些文本的解释学和主题解释的前提。因此,我的阅读与保罗·德曼(Paul de Man)追求阅读的大型项目保持一致,该项目可以辨别组织关键术语的分布和变动的修辞模式。就这一点而言,德曼认为,只有在明确了文本的修辞状态之后,才可以考虑使用增值问题。修辞性阅读涉及中止这一信念,即文学语言是指除了自身之外的任何事物。这种方法最终导致对可读性的“起源”及其与文本的关系的审查,这种审查对诠释学和主题解释模式构成威胁,因此也对卡夫卡和克尔凯郭尔的文本中支持这种理解的方面构成威胁。解释。我对重复的阅读研究了基尔凯郭尔和卡夫卡的文本在多大程度上同意并邀请了修辞学的阅读。这样的阅读需要检查以下要素:文本对隐喻逻辑的依赖和破坏;文本根据邻接而不是超越,实质性而不是比喻含义的逻辑进行破坏。文本如何基于文本含义与含义之间的差异;文本对自身可读性的干扰,以及它们如何以相反的方式质疑可读性的起源;文本如何讨论和运用讽刺意味以至于使其超越文本;撤销的结构如何实例化从“常规”讽刺到讽刺的转变;这段话如何显示出从将不可读取性视为文本的产物破坏了文本的工作方式到将不可读取性视为可怕的可读性条件的转变;最终,文本瞥见了语言的怪异性,主要是语言在机器中发挥了作用。我已将这些问题的考试命名为重复阅读。

著录项

  • 作者

    Butin, Gitte Wernaa.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Virginia.;

  • 授予单位 University of Virginia.;
  • 学科 Religion Philosophy of.; Language Modern.; Language Rhetoric and Composition.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 465 p.
  • 总页数 465
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 宗教理论、宗教思想;语言学;语言学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:41:44

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号