首页> 外文学位 >A quantitative comparative and correlational study of critical success factors for information technology projects.
【24h】

A quantitative comparative and correlational study of critical success factors for information technology projects.

机译:信息技术项目关键成功因素的定量比较和相关研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The problem addressed in this study was the high failure rate of software development projects. There has been a trend in software development which has moved away from traditional approaches towards hybrid models tailored to the specific project and type of organization. A number of authors have argued for the use of hybrid models to help overcome weaknesses and limitations of traditional models, but the evidence base in support of this remains relatively weak. In this quantitative survey study, the extent to which project success varies as a function of IT managers' software development approach was examined. In addition, possible differences based on whether or not Six Sigma has been implemented in the organization, and possible relationships between project success and project size and managers' years of software development experience were explored. Data were gathered by the means of a survey questionnaire distributed in electronic format over the Internet to IT managers. The results indicated that (a) both agile and hybrid methods produced higher project success scores than other, non-waterfall methods; (b) project success was higher when Six Sigma was implemented than when Six Sigma was not implemented; (c) when team size was small, project success scores tended to be lower than when group size was large, with project success scores for projects having medium-sized teams not differing from those for small or large teams; (d) project success scores did not differ between low cost projects, moderate cost projects, and high cost projects; (e) project success scores for short projects, moderate projects, and long projects did not differ; and (f) more experienced managers led more successful projects. Based on these conclusions, it was recommended that agile and hybrid methods should be the preferred methods of software development for most projects and that more experienced IT managers should be sought. The researcher recommends organizations implement Six Sigma on information technology projects. In addition, it was recommended that this study should be replicated with a broader group of IT managers to examine the generalizability of the conclusions from this study to IT managers who are not members of the AITP, that future researchers should provide a more thorough assessment of the projects being rated by the participants, and that future researchers should explore team size under various software development scenarios.
机译:这项研究解决的问题是软件开发项目的高失败率。软件开发的趋势已经从传统方法转变为针对特定项目和组织类型定制的混合模型。许多作者主张使用混合模型来帮助克服传统模型的弱点和局限性,但是支持这种模型的证据基础仍然相对薄弱。在此定量调查研究中,研究了项目成功程度随IT经理的软件开发方法而变化的程度。此外,还根据组织中是否已实施“六西格码”来探讨可能的差异,并探讨了项目成功与项目规模以及经理多年的软件开发经验之间的可能关系。数据是通过以电子格式通过Internet分发给IT经理的调查问卷收集的。结果表明:(a)敏捷和混合方法均比其他非瀑布方法产生更高的项目成功分数; (b)实施六个西格码时的项目成功率要高于未实施六个西格码时的项目成功率; (c)当团队规模较小时,项目成功分数往往会比小组规模较大时低,而中型团队的项目成功分数与小型团队或大型团队的项目成功分数相同; (d)低成本项目,中等成本项目和高成本项目之间的项目成功分数没有差异; (e)短期项目,中等项目和长期项目的项目成功分数没有差异; (f)经验更丰富的经理领导了更多成功的项目。基于这些结论,建议对于大多数项目,敏捷和混合方法应是软件开发的首选方法,并且应寻求经验更丰富的IT经理。研究人员建议组织在信息技术项目上实施“六西格码”。此外,建议将本研究与更多的IT经理一起复制,以研究该结论对非AITP成员的IT经理的普遍性,未来的研究人员应提供对以下方面的更全面评估参与者正在评估的项目,以及未来的研究人员应在各种软件开发方案下探索团队规模。

著录项

  • 作者

    Williams, Charlie.;

  • 作者单位

    Capella University.;

  • 授予单位 Capella University.;
  • 学科 Information Technology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 118 p.
  • 总页数 118
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号