首页> 外文学位 >Sexual Offender Differences Regarding Personality Patterns, Risk Factors, and Sexual Interest.
【24h】

Sexual Offender Differences Regarding Personality Patterns, Risk Factors, and Sexual Interest.

机译:关于性格模式,风险因素和性兴趣的性罪犯差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examined differences in sexual offender groups related to personality characteristics, risk assessment, and victim age. In addition, the study examined differences between offenders related to sexual interest factors. The primary purpose was to determine differences in offenders as the identification of group differences could contribute to more effective treatment interventions. MANOVAs were used to assess differences between intrafamilial and extrafamilial offenders on scales of the MCMI-III. Independent Samples T-tests were used to assess differences between the type of offender (intrafamilial, extrafamilial, biological) regarding risk assessment scores from the Static-99. ANOVAs were used to assess differences between type of offender (intrafamilial, extrafamilial, contact, and non-contact) regarding scores of two scales of the AASI (Social Desirability, Cognitive Distortion). Chi-Square Tests for Independence were used to assess sexual interest as related to intrafamilial, biological, and non-contact sexual offenders. Finally, an Independent Samples T-test was used to determine if there were victim age differences for intrafamilial and extrafamilial offenders. The results indicated that there were no empirically identified differences in personality characteristics and sexual interest as a function of the relation of the child victim to the offender. Intrafamilial offenders were found to have significantly lower risk factors than extrafamilial offenders. The study also demonstrated that sexual offenders that were closer to the victim in terms of familial status were more likely to have younger victims than those who were non-related. These results confirm past research that suggests that there may be an emerging homogeneous personality type for a sexual offender that provides a contrast to the heterogeneity of the individuals who committed such an offense.
机译:这项研究检查了性罪犯群体中与人格特征,风险评估和受害人年龄有关的差异。此外,研究还检查了罪犯之间与性兴趣因素有关的差异。主要目的是确定罪犯之间的差异,因为识别群体差异可以有助于更有效的治疗干预。 MANOVA用于评估MCMI-III量表中家庭内和家庭外罪犯之间的差异。独立样本T检验用于评估来自Static-99的风险评估分数在犯罪者类型(家庭,家庭外,生物学)之间的差异。使用ANOVA评估两种类型AASI(社会期望,认知扭曲)评分的罪犯类型(家庭内,家庭外,接触和非接触)之间的差异。卡方独立性测试用于评估与家庭内,生物学和非接触性犯罪者相关的性兴趣。最后,使用独立样本T检验确定家庭内和家庭外犯罪者的受害人年龄是否存在差异。结果表明,没有根据经验确定人格特征和性兴趣的差异是儿童受害者与犯罪者之间关系的函数。发现家庭内犯罪者的危险因素明显低于家庭外犯罪者。该研究还表明,在家庭状况方面与受害者更接近的性犯罪者比那些没有亲属的性犯罪者更容易遭受年轻的受害者。这些结果证实了以往的研究,表明性犯罪者可能正在出现一种同质性人格类型,这与实施此类犯罪的人的异质性形成了对比。

著录项

  • 作者

    Johnson, Holly.;

  • 作者单位

    Regent University.;

  • 授予单位 Regent University.;
  • 学科 Counseling Psychology.;Criminology.;Clinical psychology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 159 p.
  • 总页数 159
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号