首页> 外文学位 >Colonialism, liberation, and structural-adjustment in the modern world-economy: Mozambique, South Africa, Great Britain, and Portugal and the formation of Southern Africa (before and under European hegemony).
【24h】

Colonialism, liberation, and structural-adjustment in the modern world-economy: Mozambique, South Africa, Great Britain, and Portugal and the formation of Southern Africa (before and under European hegemony).

机译:现代世界经济中的殖民主义,解放和结构调整:莫桑比克,南非,英国和葡萄牙以及南部非洲的形成(在欧洲霸权之前和之下)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The starting point of the present dissertation is the study of the historical formation of Southern Africa as an integrated region of the modern world-economy. This is considered through the analysis of the main forms of successive, unequal relationship between the core and the peoples of Southern Africa in general, those of present-day Mozambique, Zimbabwe, and South Africa in particular. The forms of relation analyzed are models of domination and control defined by the core: slavery, colonialism, decolonization, neo-colonialism, and present-day neo-liberal structural adjustment. In Southern Africa, they assumed also specific structures as forced labor, apartheid, and the Rhodesian UDI. As a form of anti-colonial, anti-systemic response to the imposition of those models a specific process of national liberation was developed. It assumed new strategies of anti-colonial and anti-apartheid armed struggle creating, at the same time, specific structures of direct and indirect resistance; of regional and systemic geo-strategies; and of cultural and post-colonial collective identities. Most importantly, it originated coherent projects of development for the future. After the early 1960s, "national liberation" was regionally assumed. It led to the military defeat of Portuguese colonialism and Rhodesian UDI. However, its illusions and initial implementation were smashed under a complex, highly destructive process of regional, military and economic destabilization led by Rhodesia, first; by South Africa, afterwards. This collapse made possible the end of apartheid in South Africa. But it resulted as well in the imposition of structural adjustment to the totality of the region. A concluding elaboration of possible, alternative scenarios to today's situation is presented.; The study of slavery, colonialism, and structural-adjustment as succeeding models of relationship between the core and the peoples of Southern Africa implied the need to consider the region before European hegemony and as part of the Indian Ocean human space. Arabic, Indian, and Chinese primacies of maritime command and trade; the multiplicity and characteristics of the trading networks and flows defining them; their secular influence on the coastal peoples of East-southern Africa; and the local impact of the development of the world-economy leading to the formation of Southern Africa are equally discussed and analyzed.
机译:本文的出发点是对南部非洲作为现代世界经济一体化地区的历史形成进行研究。通过分析南部非洲的核心人民与一般人民之间,尤其是当今的莫桑比克,津巴布韦特别是南非人民之间的接连,不平等关系的主要形式,来考虑到这一点。分析的关系形式是核心定义的控制和控制模型:奴隶制,殖民主义,非殖民化,新殖民主义和当今的新自由主义结构调整。在南部非洲,他们还假设特定的结构为强迫劳动,种族隔离和罗得西亚UDI。作为对这些模式强加的反殖民,反系统反应的一种形式,发展了民族解放的具体进程。它采取了反殖民和反种族隔离武装斗争的新战略,同时创造了直接和间接抵抗的具体结构;区域和系统性地缘战略;以及文化和后殖民的集体身份。最重要的是,它引发了未来的连贯发展项目。 1960年代初期以后,在地区假设“民族解放”。它导致葡萄牙殖民主义和罗得西亚UDI军事失败。然而,首先,在罗得西亚领导的地区,军事和经济不稳定的复杂,高度破坏性的过程中,它的幻想和最初的实施遭到了破坏。之后是南非。这场崩溃使南非种族隔离的终结成为可能。但是,这也导致对该地区整体进行结构调整。总结性地阐述了当今情况的可能替代方案。对奴隶制,殖民主义和结构调整作为南部非洲核心与人民之间关系的成功模型的研究表明,有必要考虑欧洲霸权之前的区域,并将其作为印度洋人类空间的一部分。阿拉伯,印度和中国的海上指挥和贸易首要条件;交易网络的多样性和特征以及定义它们的流程;它们对东南部非洲沿海人民的世俗影响;平等地讨论和分析了世界经济发展对南部非洲形成的局部影响。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Binghamton.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Binghamton.;
  • 学科 Sociology Social Structure and Development.; History African.; Economics General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 600 p.
  • 总页数 600
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 社会结构和社会关系;非洲史;经济学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号