首页> 外文学位 >Screenwriting double function of anonymity for female authors in Hollywood and critical issues of authorship in cinema: Two screenplay case studies: 'Grace of My Heart' and 'Edward Scissorhands'.
【24h】

Screenwriting double function of anonymity for female authors in Hollywood and critical issues of authorship in cinema: Two screenplay case studies: 'Grace of My Heart' and 'Edward Scissorhands'.

机译:好莱坞女作家的匿名剧本创作双重功能和电影院作者身份的关键问题:两个剧本案例研究:《我的心的宽限期》和《爱德华·剪刀手》。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines the authorial issue of screenwriters and writer-directors alongside the production of female authors in cinema. I consider their work to serve a double function of anonymity in Hollywood, since the director is considered the preeminent author in cinema, not the writer. In this case, while most films are assigned to male directors, female authors (screenwriters and writer-directors) have been largely absent from the spotlight, a historical fact that remains to this day.;Chapter 1 analyzes the historical development of the auteur theory in France and the United States since the mid-20th century, and shows how writing in cinema has been basically neglected by film criticism, a fact that, nevertheless, has never been completely accepted by screenwriters. This chapter also analyzes the impact of Pauline Kael's 1971 book-length essay for the New Yorker on Citizen Kane (1941), where she argued that writer Herman Mankiewicz was the primary author of the screenplay and not the other way around (director Orson Welles) as it was the general assumption of the time. The auteur theory was already fairly established by the 1970s, so when Kael's essay de-emphasized Welles' role in the creation of the film, it generated quite a frenzy of discontent among critics and academics (including Andrew Sarris), unlike most of her other writings. Later, Kael ended up publishing her essay in a book, and she included the screenplay with it, which made this a rare type of publication, since most often screenplays remain unanalyzed and unpublished material, making most people unaware of their existence when critics write about film. Kael's essay, and its "clashing" offspring, at least had the sudden advantage of forcing critics to look at the screenplay when analyzing Citizen Kane. This generated a debate, which in itself signified a major gain for screenwriting, because of the implicit screenwriting function of anonymity in cinema, where the director is considered the author.;Chapter 1 also relates topics such as the unionization of writers in Hollywood, and the issue of "possessive credit" usually appropriated by directors in the form of "a film by" on-screen description so contested by the Writers Guild of America. Historically, as long as there is a writer, the writer has always been evoked as the author, except in cinema.;Therefore, Chapter 1 discusses and unveils issues of directorial possessive authorship by proposing that the writer (or writers as the case may be) is the primary creator of the story, characters and dialogue, while the director comes second in line, by "adapting" a screenplay that had already been written and imagined by somebody else. Thus the director films a screenplay as his own creation, while it has been not been created by him or her on the page. This proposed writer-based view of authorship in cinema counterpoints the auteur theory argument (with Sarris focusing primarily on Hollywood directors as auteurs) by proposing that the writer is the one who creates and envisions the film first---not the director (who comes in later). Thus, the writer is nearly always the one who creates and builds the material first, unless the director also writes her or his own material. In which case, such writer-director should clearly be thought of as an auteur, but only insofar as the film is written and directed by the same person.;Chapters 2 and 3 complement Chapter 1 with two contemporary case studies. Two unpublished screenplays from the 1990s are analyzed: one screenplay by screenwriter Caroline Thompson (for film Edward Scissorhands, 1990), and another screenplay by writer-director Allison Anders (for film Grace of My Heart, 1996). Passages from both screenplays are cited and examined in each chapter. Because of the screenwriting positioning for female authors within Hollywood, the issue of being an "outsider" from within the system is largely evoked in Anders' film Grace of My Heart, where the trajectory of the songwriter and aspiring singer protagonist parallels the auteur struggles for female writers who aspire to being one day the complete auteur of their own work. In Edward Scissorhands---merging modern and fairytale symbolic elements---Thompson portrays Edward, the protagonist, as the "outsider artist" dislocated to an equivalent feminine position within the home sphere. Feeling excluded in his physical appearance, and castrated in his dreams of belonging to the real world, which is located evidently outside of his exotic castle, Edward sublimates all his energy into creating art, all the more removed even from the home sphere where he has been initially sheltered. Although Edward never gives up on making his sculptures, his work never becomes exactly visible either. (Abstract shortened by UMI.).
机译:本文探讨了电影编剧和作家导演的创作问题以及电影中女性作家的创作。我认为他们的作品在好莱坞具有匿名的双重功能,因为导演被认为是电影界的杰出作家,而不是作家。在这种情况下,虽然大多数电影都分配给男性导演,但女性作家(编剧和作家导演)却很少受到关注,这一历史事实至今仍然存在。;第一章分析了导演理论的历史发展。自20世纪中叶开始在法国和美国上映,并展示了电影评论基本上是如何忽略电影中写作的,尽管如此,这一事实从未被编剧完全接受。本章还分析了保琳·凯尔(Pauline Kael)于1971年写的《纽约客》长篇小说对《公民凯恩》的影响(1941年),她认为作家赫尔曼·曼基维奇是剧本的主要作者,而不是相反(导演奥森·威尔斯)因为这是当时的一般假设。导演理论在1970年代就已经很成熟了,因此当凯尔(Kael)的论文不再强调韦尔斯在电影创作中的作用时,它就引起了评论家和学者(包括安德鲁·萨里斯)的不满,这与她的大多数论文都不一样。著作。后来,凯尔(Kael)最终将其论文写成一本书,并将其包括在剧本中,这使它成为一种罕见的出版物,因为多数情况下,剧本仍未进行分析和出版,因此大多数人在评论家写信时都不知道其存在。电影。凯尔(Kael)的文章及其“冲突的”后代至少具有突然的优势,即迫使评论家在分析《公民凯恩》时要看剧本。这引起了一场辩论,这本身就标志着编剧的巨大收获,因为电影中匿名的隐式编剧功能使导演被视为作者;第1章还涉及诸如好莱坞作家联盟的话题,以及导演通常以“电影作者”的形式在屏幕上进行描述的“占有信用”问题,因此受到美国作家协会的质疑。从历史上看,只要有作家,作家总是被认为是作家,除了在电影院之外。因此,第一章通过提出作家(或视情况而定的作家)来讨论和揭示董事所有制的所有权问题。 )是故事,角色和对话的主要创作者,而导演则通过“改编”已经由他人撰写和想象的剧本而排在第二位。因此,导演拍摄的剧本是他自己的创作,而剧本不是他或她在页面上创作的。在电影中基于作者的拟议作者权观点提出了作者是首先创造和设想电影的人,而不是导演(谁来在稍后)。因此,作家几乎总是首先创建和构建材料的人,除非导演也写自己的材料。在这种情况下,应该明确地认为这样的编剧兼导演是导演,但仅在电影是由同一个人撰写和执导的范围内;第2章和第3章通过两个当代案例研究对第1章进行了补充。分析了1990年代的两个未出版的剧本:一个是编剧Caroline Thompson(为电影Edward Scissorhands,1990年),另一个是编剧兼导演兼导演Allison Anders(为Grace of My Heart,1996年)。每章都引用和检查了两个剧本的段落。由于好莱坞女性作家的编剧定位,从系统内部成为“局外人”的问题在安德斯(Anders)的电影《我的心》(Grace of My Heart)中引起了人们的注意,在那部词曲作者和有抱负的歌手主人公的轨迹上渴望有一天成为自己作品的完整导演的女性作家。在爱德华·剪刀手(Edward Scissorhands)中,融合了现代和童话般的象征元素,汤普森(Thompson)将主角爱德华(Edward)描绘成“局外人艺术家”,使其在家庭领域中占据了相当女性的位置。爱德华感觉自己被排除在外表之下,而in割于属于现实世界的梦想中,梦境显然位于他异国情调的城堡外面,爱德华将自己的全部精力升华到创造艺术上,甚至从他拥有的家庭领域中移走。最初是庇护所。尽管爱德华从未放弃创作雕塑,但他的作品也从未被完全展现出来。 (摘要由UMI缩短。)。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    University of Southern California.;

  • 授予单位 University of Southern California.;
  • 学科 Cinema.;Literature Comparative.;Womens Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 260 p.
  • 总页数 260
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:41:23
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号