首页> 外文学位 >Reliability and validity of an attribute-based autobiographical sketch medical school admission tool, the mini-curriculum vitae: Implications for admission decision making.
【24h】

Reliability and validity of an attribute-based autobiographical sketch medical school admission tool, the mini-curriculum vitae: Implications for admission decision making.

机译:基于属性的自传素描医学院录取工具的迷你课程履历的可靠性和有效性:对录取决策的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A curriculum vitae (CV) is probably the most important first piece of information for an employer to evaluate for job applications (Cole et al. 2007). The CV may lead to an interview for the position advertised. Therefore, writing a good CV is extremely essential and it is a valuable life skill to have. However, there have been debates as to the reliability and validity of a CV.;The purpose of this study was to identify other non-cognitive assessments of medical school applicants. The focus of this study was to analyze the data from a Mini-CV to determine its reliability and predictive validity to admissions measures and the Big Five Personality Inventory Scores. Moreover, the reliability of the new Mini-CV was compared to the existing Ontario Medical School Application Services Auto-Biographical Sketch (OMSAS ABS). In order to achieve this, the researcher used Generalizability (G-) Theory as a statistical framework to determine the reliability of the Mini-CV. Pearson's correlations were used to determine the predictive validity of the Mini-CV to admissions measures and the scores on the Big Five Personality Inventory. This study was divided into an Initial Study and a Final Study. The Initial Study concerned with a partial Mini-CV tool with nine items while the Final Study concerned the entire version of the Mini-CV.;For the 2013/2014 application cycle, there were 4560 applicants to the School of Medicine in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada for the 203 seats. Of these applicants, 552 applicants attempted the Mini-CV. Fifty applicants from these 552 applicants were randomly selected for the generalizability (G-) coefficient analysis.;Results showed that the G-coefficient of the Mini-CV was 0.812, which is acceptable in Medical School Admissions contrasting with the G-coefficient of 0.598 of the OMSAS ABS. The Mini-CV correlated with the Multiple Mini Interviews (MMI) scores and not with other admissions measures. For the Big Five Personality Inventory, the Mini-CV did not correlate with the Conscientiousness Scores. However, the Mini-CV correlated with the Openness and the Extraversion scores on the Big Five Personality Inventory.;Lastly, this study has implications for medical educational policy makers. A tool for admissions may only be measuring one aspect of the applicant for his or her suitability to medical school. Therefore, it is important to use as many reliable and valid tools as possible. In this way, if an applicant did not do well on one tool, he or she may still be admitted based on the performance on other tools. More tools would also increase the diversity of the medical student body; unless all the tools are measuring the same thing; which is unlikely as the correlations of admissions tools are usually not high. For some of the schools, the Grade Point Averages, Medical College Admissions Test, and the MMI are used. The Mini-CV will make an excellent screening tool to decrease the number of applicants to the MMI, as the MMI is quite costly to operate.
机译:履历(CV)可能是雇主评估求职申请的最重要的第一信息(Cole等,2007)。简历可能会导致对所招聘职位的面试。因此,撰写一份优秀的简历非常重要,这是一项宝贵的生活技能。但是,关于简历的可靠性和有效性一直存在争议。本研究的目的是确定医学院校申请人的其他非认知评估。这项研究的重点是分析Mini-CV的数据,以确定其对录取标准和“五项人格量表”得分的可靠性和预测有效性。此外,将新型Mini-CV的可靠性与现有的安大略医学院应用服务自动传阅草图(OMSAS ABS)进行了比较。为了实现这一目标,研究人员使用通用性(G-)理论作为统计框架来确定Mini-CV的可靠性。皮尔森的相关性用于确定Mini-CV对招生指标的预测有效性以及大五人格问卷上的得分。这项研究分为初步研究和最终研究。最初的研究涉及带有9个项目的部分Mini-CV工具,而最终研究则涉及Mini-CV的整个版本。对于2013/2014申请周期,安大略省汉密尔顿医学院共有4560名申请人,加拿大为203个席位。在这些申请人中,有552名申请人尝试了迷你简历。从552名申请人中随机选择了50名进行通用性(G-)系数分析。结果表明,Mini-CV的G系数为0.812,与0.598的G系数相比,这在医学院入学中是可以接受的OMSAS ABS。迷你简历与多次迷你面试(MMI)得分相关,而与其他录取指标无关。对于五种人格量表,Mini-CV与尽责分数不相关。但是,Mini-CV与五种人格量表的开放性和外向性得分相关。;最后,这项研究对医学教育政策制定者有影响。招生工具只能衡量申请人对医学院的适合程度。因此,重要的是要使用尽可能多的可靠有效的工具。这样,如果申请人在一种工具上的表现不佳,则仍然可以根据其他工具的表现被录取。更多的工具也将增加医学生群体的多样性;除非所有工具都测量同一件东西;这不太可能,因为录取工具的相关性通常不高。对于某些学校,使用平均绩点,医学院入学考试和MMI。迷你简历将成为减少MMI申请人数量的出色筛选工具,因为MMI的运营成本很高。

著录项

  • 作者

    Trinh, Kien.;

  • 作者单位

    Niagara University.;

  • 授予单位 Niagara University.;
  • 学科 Educational evaluation.;Health education.;Education.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 236 p.
  • 总页数 236
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 世界文学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:41:17

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号